IBJNews

Bargersville wins annexation dispute with Greenwood

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Town of Bargersville won a legal dispute Monday validating its annexation of 739 parcels within three miles of Greenwood's city limits and making it the exclusive sewer-service provider in the area.

Montgomery County Court Judge Thomas K. Milligan ruled in favor of Bargersville, ending a battle between the local governments. For years, Bargersville and Greenwood competed to provide sewer service to new suburban developments along State Road 135, south of Greenwood and north of Bargersville. Then, in November 2007, Bargersville began trying to annex more than 3,000 acres in the area.

Greenwood opposed the small town's annexation of property so close to its city limits and filed suit after the annexationwhich was eventually whittled down to 1,847 acres, or 739 parcelswas completed in October 2008.

Until a change in state law in 2005, Greenwood's objection would have been enough to halt Bargersville's expansion, but the law now allows a town to proceed with annexation within three miles of a city, as long as it has consent from 51 percent of landowners.

Bargersville's method of obtaining consent became the basis of Greenwood's lawsuit. The town did not go out and ask homeowners to sign agreements drawn up solely for the annexation. Instead, it included a waiver for future annexation in its sewer-service agreements, many of which were signed by a developer. In many cases, the documented consent would be found in a homeowner's chain of title.

Milligan ruled that Bargersville's method was valid. In addition, the judge said the town was clearly first to try to annex the territory, invalidating Greenwood's own annexation attempt, started in November 2008. Finally, Milligan ruled that Bargersville has the exclusive right to provide sewer service in the disputed territory.

Bargersville's Town Council issued a statement saying, "This ruling means that it is time for our community to begin the healing process. There is no question the lawsuit has been divisive. It is time for the healing to begin."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Choice between a democrat and a question mark? Take the question mark. We have all seen what the democrats will do.

  2. Its easy to blame workers. What about the Management of the Mill. Its not smart in business to not have a back up plan. Workers are afforded sick days in most cases. Union or not. Whether drunk partying, or a real sickness. Why would you as a businessman/woman not have a rotation of workers incase this happens. This is not an exclusive union protection. If the company can prove bad intentions on the part of any union employee. They can take action. Most CBA's have a 3 strike policy. Just like most Non-union company policies. You should read a CBA sometime. There are protections for companies too. Unions understand that businesses need to make money. If they don't, the union's member won't have a place to work.

  3. My kids play hockey on the North side and we have been very happy with the youth program. More Ice would create more opportunity for kids to pay this great sport. With 3 rinks that would also create more figure skating opportunities. What better gift to give your kids than a sport they will love!

  4. Naah, only Indy place fans were robbed of seeing Zanardi race. CART fans saw his amazing talents just about every weekend. And F1 fans saw him too. Zanardi didn't care he wasn't at Indy, neither do 99.18% of other race fans world wide. And CART fans are quite pleased of the domination of their drivers and owners have had at Indy, in the IRL, and in the current Indycar series....almost 99.18% of the time since 2000 Indy 500. I respect Zanardi, but his life goes on without Indy. Sucks to be you Capt.

  5. So let me get this right: gun permits online are fraud proof, but voting is as easy as 1-2-3.--But at least we agree that someone without a photo ID cannot be trusted with a gun.

ADVERTISEMENT