IBJNews

Bargersville wins annexation dispute with Greenwood

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Town of Bargersville won a legal dispute Monday validating its annexation of 739 parcels within three miles of Greenwood's city limits and making it the exclusive sewer-service provider in the area.

Montgomery County Court Judge Thomas K. Milligan ruled in favor of Bargersville, ending a battle between the local governments. For years, Bargersville and Greenwood competed to provide sewer service to new suburban developments along State Road 135, south of Greenwood and north of Bargersville. Then, in November 2007, Bargersville began trying to annex more than 3,000 acres in the area.

Greenwood opposed the small town's annexation of property so close to its city limits and filed suit after the annexationwhich was eventually whittled down to 1,847 acres, or 739 parcelswas completed in October 2008.

Until a change in state law in 2005, Greenwood's objection would have been enough to halt Bargersville's expansion, but the law now allows a town to proceed with annexation within three miles of a city, as long as it has consent from 51 percent of landowners.

Bargersville's method of obtaining consent became the basis of Greenwood's lawsuit. The town did not go out and ask homeowners to sign agreements drawn up solely for the annexation. Instead, it included a waiver for future annexation in its sewer-service agreements, many of which were signed by a developer. In many cases, the documented consent would be found in a homeowner's chain of title.

Milligan ruled that Bargersville's method was valid. In addition, the judge said the town was clearly first to try to annex the territory, invalidating Greenwood's own annexation attempt, started in November 2008. Finally, Milligan ruled that Bargersville has the exclusive right to provide sewer service in the disputed territory.

Bargersville's Town Council issued a statement saying, "This ruling means that it is time for our community to begin the healing process. There is no question the lawsuit has been divisive. It is time for the healing to begin."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT