IBJNews

UPDATE: Bennett accepts $5,000 fine in ethics settlement

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana's State Ethics Commission voted unanimously Thursday to fine former state school Superintendent Tony Bennett $5,000 for breaking ethics rules by using state resources to conduct campaign work.

The panel approved without discussion a settlement reached between Bennett's defense team and Indiana Inspector General David Thomas.

After the hearing, Bennett's lawyer Larry Mackey said the lesson was that Bennett should have re-written Indiana Department of Education policy to allow for campaign work on state equipment, and then he could have avoided the fine altogether.

"An important part of the reason we're here today is that Dr. Bennett as an officeholder, an elected officeholder, had every right to engage in political activity, unlike state employees. And that's the important message here," Mackey said. "But he has to follow the rules. And the rules are, write a policy if you're going to use state computers to do any political activity, even if you're an officeholder."

The settlement showed that Bennett's state and campaign staffs met at his Statehouse office to coordinate scheduling using state software and computers during his unsuccessful 2012 re-election bid. State investigators also determined that campaign fundraising lists found on state servers had been transferred there by accident in January 2013 by one of Bennett's state staffers.

Investigators determined those actions violated the Indiana Department of Education's ethics rules.

"Limited personal uses of the agency's computer systems for political activity on my part would have been permitted if I had implemented policies that expressly permitted those uses. I did not and the failure to implement those policies is no one's fault but my own," Bennett said in a statement released by his defense team Wednesday night.

Bennett, a Republican, also said that he hoped report marks a "final, conclusive end" to questions about the grading formula changes he made. State investigators said they could not find evidence of a direct quid pro quo.

Bennett resigned as Florida's schools chief in August 2013 after The Associated Press published emails showing changes he made in Indiana's school-grading formula that benefited the Indianapolis charter school founded by one of his donors, Christel DeHaan. Bennett and his staff changed the grading formula twice in secret to raise the DeHaan school's grade from a "C'' to an "A''. Other schools benefited as well, but only DeHaan's benefited from both changes.

Bennett claimed "exoneration" last September when a pair of legislative investigators determined that he had applied the changes benefiting DeHaan's charter school to other schools as well. But the report's authors said their effort neither condemned nor vindicated Bennett.

A spokeswoman for Marion County Prosecutor Terry Curry confirmed the office received the evidence compiled by state investigators but declined prosecution in the case.

A spokesman for U.S. Attorney Joe Hogsett, whose office investigates public corruption cases, would neither confirm nor deny any investigation of Bennett.

The seven-page report from the inspector general does not address questions of possible ghost employment by Bennett's staff. One email sent from Bennett to his top staff in 2012 asked them to dissect a campaign appearance by his then-opponent, Democratic schools Superintendent Glenda Ritz. Another email from then-Chief of Staff Heather Neal discussed seeking campaign finance reports on state time.

It's also unclear whether all of the campaign lists were transferred to state computers after the November 2012 election, as Bennett said in the settlement. A copy of "The 5000" campaign list was created in August 2009 by Cam Savage, then Bennett's state communications director, and provided to the AP in a folder with numerous other lists dealing with the Department of Education, including cellphone numbers for top staff and media contacts.

State Democratic Party Chairman John Zody called Bennett's fine "a slap on the wrist." Indiana House Minority Leader Scott Pelath, D-Michigan City, criticized the ethics commission for letting Bennett "cut a deal in private that enables him to get off for the price of a used car."

Indiana's inspector general was appointed by Republican Gov. Mike Pence and reports its findings to the State Ethics Commission, which is also appointed by Indiana's governor.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Write your own policy
    Bennett's attorney's comments say it all. Make your policies for every dishonest deed you do and it makes it right. Brilliant! Thank goodness Tony Bennett is long gone along with his attorney.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT