IBJNews

Big Anderson church files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Madison Park Church of God in Anderson has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization, saying it was the victim of the recession and the closing of a General Motors Co. plant.

The church, originally known as North Anderson Church of God and located on Scatterfield Road, bought a 200-acre site near Interstate 69 in 2007 and built a church there using three bridge loans. One $6 million loan matured in July 12 and couldn’t be repaid because the church was unable to sell some of the real estate.

The bankruptcy petition, filed July 12 in Indianapolis, lists assets of less than $10 million and debt exceeding $10 million.

Madison Park Church is looking for a pastor, according to its website. In April, Jim Lyon had been the church's pastor for 22 years, said he was stepping down to become the general director-designate of the Anderson-based Church of God Ministries, which has 2,200 congregations around North America.

The Herald Bulletin of Anderson said about 3,000 families attend Madison Park Church.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • church
    any development would have been for senior housing, missionary housing, etc. all NON-profit stuff for the betterment of Anderson, not commercial for profit ventures.
  • Taxes
    I have long held the position that the newer churches (or, mega-churches) are a business rather than a place of worship. They should either forego their tax-exempt status OR, at an absolute minimum, only be property-tax-exempt for the church itself. In the instant situation, the 199 acres for parking, playgrounds, miscellaneous, should all be subject to property taxes, zoned residential in most situations. I am more than a little tired of seeing 25+ acres church sites popping up all over Fishers and Carmel in what should be residential areas, and we taxpayers have to pick up the difference in taxes...
    • Right On
      Well said Ben. I agree, tax the churches.
    • Tax The Churches
      As long as we're on the subject, tax the churches. There is good money in the God business. And yes, it is a business. Why do my employees and company pay taxes on the service we provide? Look at the materials of construction used in a church. While our houses are made of siding, they would be made of brick and limestone too if we didn't pay taxes. Tax them. And let them use siding our their houses too.
    • Pay Your Debtors
      One or more banks is going to take it on the chin because they took a flier on a speculative real estate deal. What church needs 200 acres and why? The banks deserve to lose thier shirts and the church should be embarrased for getting into something they know nothing about. I beleive the bible says to pay your debts.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

    ADVERTISEMENT