IBJNews

Big donor leaves Indianapolis Museum of Art board

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis Museum of Art must live with $2 million less in endowment revenue next fiscal year, and prominent donor Wayne Zink won’t be on the board of governors to help close the gap.

Zink, CEO of Endangered Species Chocolate, an Indianapolis candy maker, resigned from the board this month. Zink’s name is on a reception hall at the museum, and he’s served as chairman of two gala events this year.

Zink’s departure came about a month after the museum trimmed $1.1 million from its current budget because it was about 30-percent short of its quarterly fund-raising goal. The budget for the year beginning July 1 dropped from $24.9 million to $23.8 million. The savings will come mainly through one-week furloughs for 281 full- and part-time employees.

It’s unclear exactly why Zink would leave now. He declined to comment, and people close to the matter offered different explanations.

Martin Radecki, a former IMA conservator who has worked with Zink on other charitable causes, claims Zink had a difference of opinion with CEO Maxwell Anderson.

“Wayne was very upset with Max on this latest budget issue,” he said.

IMA CEO Maxwell Anderson


Anderson and other board members would not comment on Zink’s reasons. Vice Chairman Stephen Russell chalked it up to exhaustion.

“Wayne has been passionately involved,” he said.

Zink recently served as chairman of a black-tie reception for the current special exhibit, “Sacred Spain.” He was also chairman of a 125th anniversary gala.

The IMA’s 375-seat reception hall, the Deer-Zink Pavilion, is named after Zink and his partner, Randolph Deer.

 

“Wayne decided he has spent so much time involved in the IMA. There are other things in his life,” Russell said.

Russell added that he thinks Radecki simply has an ax to grind in linking Zink’s departure to Anderson and the museum’s budget woes. A senior conservator, Radecki was one of 21 full- and part-time employees who lost their jobs when the IMA restructured in February.

The recent budget cut isn’t likely to be the last. The IMA is on a long-term schedule to reduce dependence on its $313 million foundation.

Investment losses from 2008, plus a reduction in the draw rate, mean that, in the 2011 fiscal year, the IMA will see about $2 million less in endowment revenue, Chief Financial Officer Anne Munsch said.

Anderson thinks he can recoup some of that money through a successful exhibit in the fall of 2010, a revival in donations, and growth in the event-catering business.

“I’m working like the devil, like the rest of the staff, to have the best possible result,” he said.

Although the number of museum members has slipped below 10,000 over the last few years, Anderson said there’s a glimmer of hope among higher-end supporters. So far this year, the museum has collected $186,000 in dues from “council” members—who pay $1,500 or more. That’s up $35,000 over the same period last year.

He also sees an opportunity for the museum to collect more money through its new catering-operations agreement with Maryland-based Sodexo. So-called earned income now accounts for 12 percent of annual revenue, and Anderson said, “Earned revenue can be a more significant source of revenue for us going forward.”

But Anderson declined to make any broad predictions, saying he prefers to “calibrate” the budget on a monthly basis.

Early in the current fiscal year, the IMA looked to be in danger of going into the red. First-quarter contributions were about $457,000 short of the target of $1.5 million.

Munsch said a quarterly gap like that is not unusual, but, “We chose to take early action. We want to be more conservative, and be pleasantly relieved if the numbers are higher [by year-end].”

Hitting budget targets on donations and earned income will become more important as the IMA weans itself off a heavy reliance on endowment revenue.

The IMA’s endowment is one of the largest among art museums nationally and by far among Indianapolis cultural institutions. It stood as high as $393 million at the end of 2007.

This year, the endowment provides $16.4 million, or 69 percent of IMA’s annual operating revenue.

The stock market crash sent it south of $281 million by the end of 2008.

The endowment became more important after the museum’s $74 million expansion in 2006, which drove up operating expenses, including such items as utilities and especially security personnel, Munsch said.

The IMA covered its higher costs by drawing a larger percentage from the endowment.

A not-for-profit typically spends 5 percent to 6 percent of its foundation’s value, based on a 12-quarter rolling average.

The IMA’s board ramped up the spending rate from 7 percent in 2006 to 8.5 percent in 2007, the first year the museum fully occupied its new galleries.

Munsch said the plan was to eventually cover the costs by netting more annual donations and increasing revenue from things like retail sales and special-exhibit admission.

The recession hit before those efforts could close the gap, Munsch said.

The IMA sustained its spending rate at 8.4 percent for 2008 and the first half of 2009. (The museum changed its bookkeeping to a July-June fiscal year during that 18-month period.)

Now the draw rate is 7.5 percent and is expected to drop another half-point in the 2011 fiscal year. The board’s goal is to take spending back to 5.5 percent, Munsch said.

Considering the early action on the current budget, board member John Krauss said he feels good about the IMA’s financial management. “The IMA is being prudent,” he said.•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Power Play
    These particular board members are known for manipulating situations with their money. It is similar to a 5 year old action, "Play my way or I will leave and take my toys with me."
  • Quelle Horreur!
    A French-owned company, how shocking! You mean it is owned by one of our major trading partners and a close ally, instead of by a Chinese company? Gosh, that is surprising!
  • PS
    By the way, Sodexo...Is a French owned company with lobby ties to the hill that can verify this.
    • Spoiled...
      No the museum is not in "good" hands with Max. He spends hand over fist and the endowment is rapidly vanishing as well. Rumors for Max on the short list for the MET are just that...rumors. In New York, Max is a joke and the only thing he can hope to lean on is his attractive spouse. He has done here what hes has done elsewhere, He has taken the business, turned it up side down, and shaken out everything, including the useful things. When the money is exhausted, he will move on and do this someplace else.
    • Yes and no
      I agree that it is much better under Max. It is also much worse. Previous IMA boards dreamed of building an endowment that would allow the museum to be self-sustaining. Later boards dreamed of building a museum that would attract international recognition. Under Max they have achieved the latter, and for whatever reason--abandoned the former. Now the museum is in all the art magazines every month, and it's also--annually--drawing down the principal of an endowment that took decades to build.

      Be careful what you wish for.
    • IMA is in good hands
      The IMA, as a cultural destination, is better than it's ever been in my 31 years of living here. And that's largely due to Mr. Anderson's leadership. I trust him, that's all I'm saying. Best of luck to the IMA team.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. Cramer agrees...says don't buy it and sell it if you own it! Their "pay to play" cost is this issue. As long as they charge customers, they never will attain the critical mass needed to be a successful on company...Jim Cramer quote.

      2. My responses to some of the comments would include the following: 1. Our offer which included the forgiveness of debt (this is an immediate forgiveness and is not "spread over many years")represents debt that due to a reduction of interest rates in the economy arguably represents consideration together with the cash component of our offer that exceeds the $2.1 million apparently offered by another party. 2. The previous $2.1 million cash offer that was turned down by the CRC would have netted the CRC substantially less than $2.1 million. As a result even in hindsight the CRC was wise in turning down that offer. 3. With regard to "concerned Carmelite's" discussion of the previous financing Pedcor gave up $16.5 million in City debt in addition to the conveyance of the garage (appraised at $13 million)in exchange for the $22.5 million cash and debt obligations. The local media never discussed the $16.5 million in debt that we gave up which would show that we gave $29.5 million in value for the $23.5 million. 4.Pedcor would have been much happier if Brian was still operating his Deli and only made this offer as we believe that we can redevelop the building into something that will be better for the City and City Center where both Pedcor the citizens of Carmel have a large investment. Bruce Cordingley, President, Pedcor

      3. I've been looking for news on Corner Bakery, too, but there doesn't seem to be any info out there. I prefer them over Panera and Paradise so can't wait to see where they'll be!

      4. WGN actually is two channels: 1. WGN Chicago, seen only in Chicago (and parts of Canada) - this station is one of the flagship CW affiliates. 2. WGN America - a nationwide cable channel that doesn't carry any CW programming, and doesn't have local affiliates. (In addition, as WGN is owned by Tribune, just like WTTV, WTTK, and WXIN, I can't imagine they would do anything to help WISH.) In Indianapolis, CW programming is already seen on WTTV 4 and WTTK 29, and when CBS takes over those stations' main channels, the CW will move to a sub channel, such as 4.2 or 4.3 and 29.2 or 29.3. TBS is only a cable channel these days and does not affiliate with local stations. WISH could move the MyNetwork affiliation from WNDY 23 to WISH 8, but I am beginning to think they may prefer to put together their own lineup of syndicated programming instead. While much of it would be "reruns" from broadcast or cable, that's pretty much what the MyNetwork does these days anyway. So since WISH has the choice, they may want to customize their lineup by choosing programs that they feel will garner better ratings in this market.

      5. The Pedcor debt is from the CRC paying ~$23M for the Pedcor's parking garage at City Center that is apprased at $13M. Why did we pay over the top money for a private businesses parking? What did we get out of it? Pedcor got free parking for their apartment and business tenants. Pedcor now gets another building for free that taxpayers have ~$3M tied up in. This is NOT a win win for taxpayers. It is just a win for Pedcor who contributes heavily to the Friends of Jim Brainard. The campaign reports are on the Hamilton County website. http://www2.hamiltoncounty.in.gov/publicdocs/Campaign%20Finance%20Images/defaultfiles.asp?ARG1=Campaign Finance Images&ARG2=/Brainard, Jim

      ADVERTISEMENT