Bill seeks bigger tax breaks for individuals, families

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Hoosier individuals and families could get bigger tax breaks under a House bill debated in the Ways and Means Committee on Tuesday.

The bill, backed by Gov. Mike Pence and authored by Chairman Tim Brown, R-Crawfordsville, would tie individual and family tax deductions to increases in inflation.

That would give individuals, parents, the blind and the elderly regular increases in the tax breaks. The amount of the exemptions are currently set in state law.

“With time, inflation has been a tax increaser to Hoosier households,” Brown said.

The new formula for tax exemptions would be pegged to the consumer price index and retroactive to Jan. 1.

The affected exemptions:

— $1,000 personal exemption for those who don’t itemize deductions, which would increase to an estimated $1,034 by 2015.

— $1,500 per dependent child, which would increase to an estimated $1,551 by 2015.

— $1,000 for Hoosiers 65 years or older, which would increase to $1,034 by 2015.

— $500 for taxpayers 65 years old who has taxable income of $40,000 or less, which would increase to $517 by 2015.

The increases would cost the state—and therefore save taxpayers—about $5.5 million in revenue in fiscal year 2015. The state would continue to pay more each year if inflation continues to rise to an estimated $38.7 million by 2021.

Lindsey Craig, the family policy director for Gov. Mike Pence, testified in favor of the bill. Craig also testified on behalf of the absent Curt Smith, president of the Indiana Family Institute.

“This helps those people we care the most about, the people living on the edge of ‘can I make it or can I not make it’,” Brown said in closing.

The committee did not vote on the bill Tuesday due to a lack of quorum.


  • Equality?
    The Federal tax administration allows for a gradual increase, based upon various factors, to allow personal exemptions to rise (typically) on an annual basis. Why does the State of Indiana feel that it is necessary to provide an approximately 50% larger deduction for children than it does for adults? I'm sure that it's just a coincidence that this is being pushed by Mr. Pence, since he saw fit to go forth and multiply and bring a "whole passel o' chillun" into the world?

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Why not take some time to do some research before traveling to that Indiana town or city, and find the ones that are no smoking either inside, or have a patio? People like yourself are just being selfish, and unnecessarily trying to take away all indoor venues that smokers can enjoy themselves at. Last time I checked, it is still a free country, and businesses do respond to market pressure and will ban smoking, if there's enough demand by customers for it(i.e. Linebacker Lounge in South Bend, and Rack and Helen's in New Haven, IN, outside of Fort Wayne). Indiana law already unnecessarily forced restaurants with a bar area to be no smoking, so why not support those restaurants that were forced to ban smoking against their will? Also, I'm always surprised at the number of bars that chose to ban smoking on their own, in non-ban parts of Indiana I'll sometimes travel into. Whiting, IN(just southeast of Chicago) has at least a few bars that went no smoking on their own accord, and despite no selfish government ban forcing those bars to make that move against their will! I'd much rather have a balance of both smoking and non-smoking bars, rather than a complete bar smoking ban that'll only force more bars to close their doors. And besides IMO, there are much worser things to worry about, than cigarette smoke inside a bar. If you feel a bar is too smoky, then simply walk out and take your business to a different bar!

  2. As other states are realizing the harm in jailing offenders of marijuana...Indiana steps backwards into the script of Reefer Madness. Well...you guys voted for your Gov...up to you to vote him out. Signed, Citizen of Florida...the next state to have medical marijuana.

  3. It's empowering for this niche community to know that they have an advocate on their side in case things go awry. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lrst9VXVKfE

  4. Apparently the settlement over Angie's List "bundling" charges hasn't stopped the practice! My membership is up for renewal, and I'm on my third email trying to get a "basic" membership rather than the "bundled" version they're trying to charge me for. Frustrating!!

  5. Well....as a vendor to both of these builders I guess I have the right to comment. Davis closed his doors with integrity.He paid me every penny he owed me. Estridge,STILL owes me thousands and thousands of dollars. The last few years of my life have been spent working 2 jobs, paying off the suppliers I used to work on Estridge jobs and just struggling to survive. Shame on you Paul...and shame on you IBJ! Maybe you should have contacted the hundreds of vendors that Paul stiffed. I'm sure your "rises from the ashes" spin on reporting would have contained true stories of real people who have struggled to find work and pay of their debts (something that Paul didn't even attempt to do).