Bill seeks bigger tax breaks for individuals, families

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Hoosier individuals and families could get bigger tax breaks under a House bill debated in the Ways and Means Committee on Tuesday.

The bill, backed by Gov. Mike Pence and authored by Chairman Tim Brown, R-Crawfordsville, would tie individual and family tax deductions to increases in inflation.

That would give individuals, parents, the blind and the elderly regular increases in the tax breaks. The amount of the exemptions are currently set in state law.

“With time, inflation has been a tax increaser to Hoosier households,” Brown said.

The new formula for tax exemptions would be pegged to the consumer price index and retroactive to Jan. 1.

The affected exemptions:

— $1,000 personal exemption for those who don’t itemize deductions, which would increase to an estimated $1,034 by 2015.

— $1,500 per dependent child, which would increase to an estimated $1,551 by 2015.

— $1,000 for Hoosiers 65 years or older, which would increase to $1,034 by 2015.

— $500 for taxpayers 65 years old who has taxable income of $40,000 or less, which would increase to $517 by 2015.

The increases would cost the state—and therefore save taxpayers—about $5.5 million in revenue in fiscal year 2015. The state would continue to pay more each year if inflation continues to rise to an estimated $38.7 million by 2021.

Lindsey Craig, the family policy director for Gov. Mike Pence, testified in favor of the bill. Craig also testified on behalf of the absent Curt Smith, president of the Indiana Family Institute.

“This helps those people we care the most about, the people living on the edge of ‘can I make it or can I not make it’,” Brown said in closing.

The committee did not vote on the bill Tuesday due to a lack of quorum.


  • Equality?
    The Federal tax administration allows for a gradual increase, based upon various factors, to allow personal exemptions to rise (typically) on an annual basis. Why does the State of Indiana feel that it is necessary to provide an approximately 50% larger deduction for children than it does for adults? I'm sure that it's just a coincidence that this is being pushed by Mr. Pence, since he saw fit to go forth and multiply and bring a "whole passel o' chillun" into the world?

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  2. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  3. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  4. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

  5. I live downtown Indy and had to be in downtown Chicago for a meeting. In other words, I am the target demographic for this train. It leaves at 6:00-- early but doable. Then I saw it takes 5+ hours. No way. I drove. I'm sure I paid 3 to 5 times as much once you factor in gas, parking, and tolls, but it was reimbursed so not a factor for me. Any business traveler is going to take the option that gets there quickly and reliably... and leisure travelers are going to take the option that has a good schedule and promotional prices (i.e., Megabus). Indy to Chicago is the right distance (too short to fly but takes several hours to drive) that this train could be extremely successful even without subsidies, if they could figure out how to have several frequencies (at least 3x/day) and make the trip in a reasonable amount of time. For those who have never lived on the east coast-- Amtrak is the #1 choice for NY-DC and NY-Boston. They have the Acela service, it runs almost every hour, and it takes you from downtown to downtown. It beats driving and flying hands down. It is too bad that we cannot build something like this in the midwest, at least to connect the bigger cities.