IBJNews

Bill that would shift Indiana voucher oversight advances

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana's new Democratic state schools superintendent would no longer oversee the private school voucher program that she has opposed under a proposal approved Tuesday by a Republican-controlled legislative committee.

The House Education Committee voted 7-4 along party lines to endorse the bill that would move the handling of applications for the vouchers and distribution of the money to the state's Office of Management and Budget, which reports to Republican Gov. Mike Pence.

The vote sparked quick criticism from Democrats, who accused Republicans of playing politics with schools superintendent Glenda Ritz. The GOP controls the General Assembly, the governor's office and all other elected executive offices.

"We have one lone Democrat serving in this entire Statehouse and it just happens to be Superintendent Glenda Ritz," said Democratic Rep. Shelli VanDenburgh of Crown Point, who charged the measure challenged Ritz's integrity and capabilities. "This is very political."

The proposal was authored by committee Chairman Robert Behning, R-Indianapolis, who introduced the bill by citing Ritz's involvement in a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the voucher program before her election last fall.

"She does not believe public dollars should go to private schools," said Behning, a leading sponsor of the state voucher law adopted in 2011. "She's said that many times, pre-election and postelection."

Committee Democrats and a top aide to Ritz said she hasn't done anything to interfere with the voucher program since she took office Jan. 14.

"We believe that it is an unnecessary taking away of a power of the superintendent at a time when she has not even had the chance, really, to settle into her job," said John Barnes, Ritz's legislative liaison.

Ritz, a former suburban Indianapolis school librarian, won election last year with a grass-roots campaign fueled by teacher anger over education changes Bennett pushed.

She was a plaintiff in a lawsuit seeking to overturn the voucher program but withdrew after she won election. The state Supreme Court heard arguments in that case in late November but hasn't yet ruled.

Behning also questioned why the Department of Education hadn't opened the voucher application period for parents in February as former Republican superintendent Tony Bennett had done.

Leaders of some private schools told the committee that Department of Education's decision to accept voucher applications in February last year helped parents make early decisions on whether to enroll their children.

Holy Cross Central School Principal Ruth Tinsley said about 90 of 210 students received vouchers to attend the Catholic school near downtown Indianapolis.

"Our families will have to wait and are concerned about making that decision now because without the vouchers they would not be able to attend the school," Tinsley said.

Barnes attributed delays to the recent transition in leadership and said the agency hoped to begin accepting voucher applications soon.

Senate education committee Chairman Dennis Kruse, R-Auburn, said Tuesday he would consider holding a hearing on the voucher oversight proposal if it clears the House. He had previously declined to take action on any Senate bills that would shift responsibilities away from Ritz.

Kruse said he hasn't heard any complaints about how the Education Department is handling the voucher program.

"I think the voucher law should be fully implemented by the Department of Education and they should not stall or hold it up," Kruse said. "If they are stalling, I would not like that."

The state is paying some $37 million to provide voucher to about 9,100 students this school year. The House Republican budget proposal forecasts spending for the voucher program will grow over the next two years to $63 million annually with 15,000 students.

Behning, the House education chairman, said he had questioned whether the Education Department was the proper agency to oversee the voucher program when it was adopted two years ago and wasn't sure the Office of Management and Budget would end up handling the process.

"I really would rather create an independent group and create a structure that may have more independence," he said. "That's just where it is today."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Small government??
    So the solution for those opposed to bloated bureaucracy is to create another agency? Brilliant. It must hurt to twist your body that way.
  • Winners and whiners
    The Repubs won the seats. The Dems, and the teacher union PAC, lost the schools loooooonnnnng ago. So what if there is a dem heading education. Decades of education leadership ineptness have led to this voucher program. Had you liberal socialists REALLY cared about the kids over the past fifty or so years we wouldn't be having this discussion. You don't have any better ideas than to throw more good money after bad (do you even now what that means?). So why do so many want vouchers?
  • Glad I Don't Have Kids
    Once again partisan politics plays a role in dumbing down Indiana education. Idiots.
  • Give the woman a chance to do her job.
    To Indiana Republicans: You lost the State Superintendent of Public Instruction race in November. Tony Bennett was despised and voted out. Time to let it go. A majority of voters would like to give Ritz a chance. Let her do her job and honor the will of the people. But if you did that, then you wouldn't be the Indiana GOP.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

    2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

    3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

    4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

    5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.

    ADVERTISEMENT