IBJNews

Bill seeks elected utility consumer counselor

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A legislator is proposing that Indiana’s utility consumer counselor be elected rather than appointed by the governor.

House Bill 1082, filed by Rep. Win Moses, D-Fort Wayne, would place the post on the ballot starting this year, with the term of the elected official beginning next Jan. 1.

The job of utility consumer counselor is currently filled by David Stippler, a former AT&T executive and attorney with Indianapolis-based Bingham McHale LLP. He was appointed by Gov. Mitch Daniels in 2008.

The Office of Utility Consumer Counselor intervenes in cases before the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission and can take legal action in court. It has about 50 employees, including analysts, engineers, economists and attorneys.

Moses proposed a similar bill in the 2010 session, but it died in a house committee.

The bill could get more attention this time around in light of an ethics scandal that erupted in late 2010 at the IURC.

Daniels fired former IURC Chairman David Lott Hardy after it became known Hardy failed to pull administrative law judge Scott Storms from cases involving Duke Energy Corp. while Storms was discussing employment with Duke.

Hardy also appeared to be coaching Storms to get the OK of the state’s ethics review board, all the while mocking the process, e-mails released by the state showed.

Storms was later hired by Duke—then fired—after the scandal embarrassed Duke and the Daniels administration.

E-mails also revealed that Hardy had a chummy relationship with officials at Duke, which has been embroiled in cost overruns at its $3 billion Edwardsport coal-gasification generating plant. Those overruns have been fought at the commission by industrial electric customers and by Indianapolis-based Citizens Action Coalition.

CAC supports the concept of an elected consumer utility counselor, arguing that appointees ultimately are beholden to the agenda of the governor.

Daniels has been a proponent of Duke’s Edwardsport plant, citing its benefits to the state’s coal-mining industry and the potential to reduce air pollution compared with traditional coal-fired plants.

The IURC has for years been a revolving door for employment to and from utility companies.

Last month, a Marion County grand jury indicted Hardy on three counts of official misconduct.

Under Moses’ bill, the elected OUCC chief would receive an annual salary of $100,000, the same as Stippler's salary.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Another Bad Idea
    This is a terrible idea, and what is surprising is that it is coming from a usually reliable, sensible legislator. When I first saw the headline, I thought this bill would have come from one of the neanderthals that comprise the Republican caucuses in both chambers, like Kruse, Banks, Delph or Waterman. People have no idea who they are electing to such offices as Supt of Public Instruction, Sec of State, Auditor or Treasurer. Why would this be any different? The average citizens' understanding of regulatory issues affecting utility matters is pretty thin, in my opinion. And why politicize this? Yes, the Daniels track record with the IURC has been abysmal, but just because of flawed appointments, don't assume that an election would be any better. What next: elections for Court Reporter/Clerk? Oh yeah, we tried that once before. Do we miss that office holder?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT