Biological drug bill advances to full Senate

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Senate is set to consider legislation that could give patients access to more options for drug treatments that derive from biological organisms.

The drugs in question – which are expected to be interchangeable with brand-name options – are not yet on the market. But supporters of the bill say they could be soon and they want Hoosiers to be able to get them.

Biological drugs are usually injectable and they’re expensive. Biological means that the drugs come from living organisms. They treat an array of diseases including cancer, Lupus and diabetes.

Some drug makers have been working on what’s called “interchangeable” biological options. Company officials say they will not be generics but will serve a similar function and have the same therapeutic outcomes as their brand name counterparts.

Senate Bill 262 creates what supporters say is a “pathway” to let Hoosiers have access to the interchangeable drugs – when they become available. Indiana could be among first states to make that possible.

The Senate Public Health & Provider Services Committee passed the bill Wednesday and it moved to the full Senate for consideration.

But with the regulation of interchangeable drugs comes new rules for the pharmacists, who would be able to choose whether to give patients the brand-name biological drug or substitute it with an interchangeable. The bill would require those pharmacists to notify doctors within 10 days of how the prescription is filled.

“The relationship between doctor and patient is important. Doctors must carefully monitor patients’ medication,” said Carla Day, a spokeswoman for the Lupus Foundation. Day has Lupus and sometime takes between five and 20 medications a day. She said she’d want her to doctor to know if there was a change.

The General Assembly has considered legislation about biological drugs in the past, but the bills have never passed, in part because of strong opposition from a variety of companies. But now, some drug companies that had opposed the bill support it because of the way doctors must be notified about the way the prescriptions are filled.

Sandoz, a generic pharmaceutical firm, was one of those companies. That’s because the previous bills only would have required doctor notification if the pharmacist used an interchangeable drug. But the bill under consideration now requires notification whenever an interchangeable is available – regardless of whether it is dispensed.

That provision is meant to ensure that pharmacists don’t discriminate against the interchangeables to avoid the notification process.

But Express Scripts, the largest pharmacy benefits manager in the nation, had other ideas about the notification.

“Express Scripts opposes prescriber notification as it as an unnecessary step and will dissuade physicians from even allowing substitution,” said a company spokeswoman, Allyson Blandsord.

But it was Sen. Brandt Hershman, R-Buck Creek, that ended the discussion before the bill passed: “Wouldn’t you want your doctor to know?” she asked.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.