IBJNews

Bloomington mayor to roll out chain-store ordinance for downtown

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Bloomington—Mayor Mark Kruzan believes this beloved college town loses a bit of its identity every time a national chain sets up shop.

Already, the first block of Kirkwood Avenue outside Indiana University’s Sample Gates hosts as many franchises as any strip center. Urban Outfitters, Dunkin Donuts, Noodles & Co. and Panda Express operate alongside Nick’s English Hut and other longtime local fixtures.

Kruzan, 49, hopes to stop the chains in their tracks. He’s contemplating an ordinance similar to those adopted by tourism-heavy communities such as Nantucket, Mass., and Ojai, Calif. The mayor has not yet floated a formal proposal, but he’s focusing on Kirkwood from the IU campus, west to the B-Line trail and storefronts facing the courthouse square.

Kruzan, a Democrat, insists that his initiative is a matter of economic survival, rather than elitism.

“This was my slogan six years ago,” he said. “Community character is synonymous with community commerce. For Bloomington, uniqueness is our strength.”

No organized opposition has emerged yet, but real estate professionals are expressing their concerns to Eric Stolberg, a downtown developer whom the mayor appointed to a study committee on the issue.

“I’m hearing from a lot of people that are scratching their heads and saying, ‘Why do we even need this?’” Stolberg said.

Chain stores have been around for years downtown. Chipotle in 2004 replaced the McDonald’s that drew so much ire when it opened in the 1980s. Kruzan said he became concerned recently when plans emerged to redevelop two key sites on Kirkwood.

One is the former Linnemeier building, 422 E. Kirkwood, which housed a dentist’s office and independently owned balloon shop. The building was demolished over the summer, and the site is slated to become luxury apartments with street-level retail. The other is the former Ladyman’s Cafe at Kirkwood and Washington Street, where a developer is planning condos with ground-floor retail.

Then last month, the owners of Smith-Holden Music announced they would close their store at 222 W. Kirkwood. The family that owns the business declined to comment. Kruzan said would-be developers are hovering around the building, which sits between the Irish Lion pub and the B-Line trail.

A chain-store ordinance wouldn’t affect the properties in transition because Kruzan doesn’t intend to put a formal proposal before the city plan commission until spring.

Kruzan predicts that by next summer, chain stores will be occupying at least two of the high-profile sites.

“Then I think people will feel the balance will be tipped,” he said. “The number is low, but the psychological impact will be high.”

Legal challenge

Every city that tries to exclude chains, or “formula” stores, from certain areas grapples with the same questions. The first is, what constitutes a chain in the first place?

In Bloomington, Kruzan is letting a study committee tackle those issues. Its members include Stolberg and Julie Thomas, a Democrat on the Monroe County council who owns a Cartridge World store downtown.

“I want to get as many things on the table as we can, prior to the formal process beginning,” Kruzan said. The committee has met once and will meet at least twice more before spring.

San Francisco decided in 2004 that any franchise with 12 or more outlets posed a threat to its neighborhood business districts. The chains are excluded completely from two of those districts. In others, chains can’t open new outlets without first obtaining a conditional use permit.

Local governments have been telling business where to go, so to speak, for decades.

In a way, the anti-chain laws are no different from restricting factories to a certain part of town, said Richard Schragger, a University of Virginia law professor who has studied the issue.

“Courts are not likely to strike down these ordinances if they’re expressed through the land-use authority of the local government,” he said.

Yet the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in 2008 invalidated legislation adopted by the Florida Keys community of Islamorada that said national retail stores could occupy no more than 2,000 square feet of space with 50 feet of frontage. The court noted that Islamorada’s measure wasn’t protecting any historic district or buildings, and the city hadn’t shown that “it has any small-town character to preserve.”

The suit was brought by a family that had tried to sell its store site to Walgreens. The deal fell through because of the local ordinance.

With the Islamorada case in mind, Kruzan is careful to say Bloomington won’t necessarily “ban” chain stores downtown. The city might take the less extreme route of restricting signage, he said.

Asked whether a set of rules about the size of corporate logos would satisfy him, Kruzan said, “Personally? No.”

The debate might boil down to whether Bloomington is a tourist town, or something else. Michael Eaton, co-owner of Rubicon, the developer that acquired the Linnemeier building last summer, thinks the city needs certain chain stores.

“The city of Bloomington wants more people to live downtown,” he said. “However, there’s not that many grocery stores. And there’s not enough locations for people to come in and buy clothes, and get their goods and services fulfilled.”

Rents climbing

When rents are rising, national chains have an advantage. Eaton said that over the last three years, rates for retail space on Kirkwood have risen from $18 to $20 per square foot annually to the high $20s or low $30s.

Eaton would not disclose the rate he’s seeking for his 4,450 square feet. If rent were as high as $30 per square foot, a single shop or restaurant tenant would have to pay $133,500 a year.

Despite the daunting overhead, all the restaurants that have expressed an interest in the space are local, Eaton said.

“The stronger, more established entities have already identified it,” he said.

Bloomington residents might embrace local flavor, but they also like conveniences. Rhiannon Vaughn, a waitress at the “locavore” haven Farm, said she would prefer more local businesses downtown, but she wouldn’t be disappointed about another chain “if it fits a niche that we need.”

Another Farm employee, Alfred Pigliacelli, seconded the idea.

“If it’s something we don’t already have one of.” He said Noodles & Co. was an example of a chain that had no other locations in town, and no close competitors.

When Lyle Feigenbaum opened the Scholar’s Inn restaurant in 1998, he competed with very few chains downtown. Now Scholar’s Inn is a group of restaurants and bakery-cafes, including a location near College Mall.

Feigenbaum is protective of downtown, which is a magnet for parents, alumni and tourists.

“I think there is value, economically, in having an area, or the heart of it, where it’s completely unique,” he said.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT