Bloomington puts new rules on chain businesses

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

City officials in Bloomington are creating new rules for chain businesses looking to open in the downtown area.

The City Council voted Wednesday night to require what it calls "standardized businesses" to obtain a special zoning permit that specifies details of the building's look and design.

Supporters say the step is intended to protect the appearance of the downtown area, which has numerous local restaurants, shops and bar whose businesses are driven by their proximity to the Indiana University campus.

The rules will apply to a nine-block area around the courthouse square and a 12-block zone that includes Kirkwood Avenue just west of the IU campus, The Herald-Times reported.

Mayor Mark Kruzan pushed as far back as 2009 to ban new chain stores and restaurants in order to protect the downtown's character, but opposition grew quickly and those proposals never won approval.

The Greater Bloomington Chamber of Commerce supported the new ordinance after fighting earlier versions this spring that could've blocked new chain businesses if officials believed there was an over concentration of them.

"We're excited about the spirit behind this," said Jeb Conrad, the chamber's CEO and president.

The ordinance defines a standardized business as having uniform services, merchandise, menus, logos, signs or exterior design. Design criteria would include whether the building complements the surrounding area with its architecture, scale and interior decor, and that any building of historical significance be preserved as much as possible.

Councilman Chris Sturbaum said changes made Wednesday were meant to exempt businesses not visible from the street from the ordinance, such as those on the second level of a building or shops without windows because they're located inside a building.

"I think this is the right direction," Sturbaum said. "We're all in this together. We all want this community to thrive."


  • Let the market decide
    It's a shame when people with no skin in the game decide what everybody else should be allowed to do or where they eat. Free Enterprize built this country and customers should be free to vote with their patronage to any business they choose, not a business that "elites" choose for them.
  • Let's Think Together
    Didn't the people of Bloomington made their voices heard when they elected the Mayor (in each election since 2004) and City Council? I have a hard time understanding how enforcing design and code standards robs the public of its voice.
  • Nope. Not the right way.
    I love locally owned independent restaurants but this elitist communist garbage is not the way. If the public prefers the local establishments then they will thrive and the national chains will find greener pastures. But you have to let the people have their voice - and if they prefer the God-awful chains then let them be. Once we give up on a free America with unfettered personal choice then all is lost.
  • Isolationists
    So does that mean if you sell Bud, that could be considered "chain" forcing bars to only sell local crafts? At the next recession will local eateries stay open? Liberal economics 101 don't work.
  • Legal standing
    You can't zone out a specific type of business, nor can you write a law that is unique to one set of businesses within a wider class of operation. Bloomington can create a design review district for all structures that have characteristics of an urban setting, which often isn't conducive to national chain businesses with one-size-fits-all buildings.
  • Let Me Know How That Works Out For You
    Good luck getting that to survive a legal challenge. The People's Republic of Bloomington always has trouble with that pesky rule of law thing.
  • Subjectivity
    What constitutes a "chain?" In my mind, Scott's and Kilroy's have become chains--they're equally tacky!
  • Good...
    The general lack of national chain businesses (aside from Star Bucks, Chipotle and Jimmy John's) is part of what makes Bloomington such a great and unique town. I'm glad to see them take further steps to ensure its diversity. The doughnut counties can keep their vinyl villages and sprawl...

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.