IBJOpinion

BOEHM: More to do to continue Indy's ascent

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Ted BoehmThose of us who have seen the progress Indianapolis has made over the last several decades are justifiably proud of what has been accomplished. At the same time, most thoughtful observers agree on the need to address a range of problems—notably crime, fiscal pressures, education, transportation and neighborhood development.

A recent study identifies an equally disturbing statistic that Indianapolis shares with Cincinnati, Columbus, and other metropolitan areas primarily in the Midwest and Southeast.

According to the study, Indianapolis ranks near the bottom of U.S. cities in the opportunity for upward economic mobility. Specifically, the percentage of Indy children raised in households in the bottom 20 percent of income who achieve middle- or upper-class incomes is significantly lower than the national average. To make matters worse, the U.S. average is below that of many other developed countries.

Interestingly, mobility was not correlated with the wealth of the community. Areas with higher average incomes did not display significantly higher opportunity for advancement. And mobility was not materially enhanced in areas that had more generous tax credits for the disadvantaged or higher taxes on the wealthy.

The makeup of the citizenry seems equally irrelevant. Areas with larger minority populations showed lower mobility than other cities, but mobility within a metropolitan area was similar among racial groups.

So what did seem to matter in making a metropolitan area fulfill the promise of America as the land of opportunity? Two of Indy’s hot topics—public education and public transportation—turn out to be center stage.

As you would expect, the study concluded the quality of an area’s primary and secondary schools is one factor highly correlated with higher mobility. Better-educated kids do better. Similarly, children fared better in cities with stronger support networks—for example, higher percentages of two-parent households and more engagement in religious and community groups.

A good public transportation system enhances opportunity. Inability to get to a better job in a reasonable time is a deterrent to advancement. And there is collateral economic and social damage apart from the inconvenience to those willing to endure long commutes. Hours spent riding a bus to work leave less time to raise children or obtain skills to qualify for a higher-paying job.

Metro areas where different income levels live relatively close to one another showed increased upward mobility. In contrast, if poorer households are concentrated over large areas, fewer escape the lowest income levels.

A recent book presents a more optimistic view of urban America. Perhaps as a result of governmental gridlock at the federal and state levels, “Metropolitan Revolution” points to metropolitan areas across the country that have emerged as innovators, finding paths to prosperity and improved quality of life tailored to their unique mix of strengths.

The book notes a dark side. Legislatures in some states regard this progress more with envy than pride and become obstacles, not facilitators.

To the extent that phenomenon is true of Indiana, it is extremely short-sighted. The Indianapolis metropolitan economy is an important economic engine that contributes far more to the state’s budget and quality of life than it takes out. It must be allowed to grow and thrive as a place of opportunity and hope to benefit the entire state.

For example, if improving public transportation will further that goal, the state should get out of the way.

The mobility study is described at http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/22/business/in-climbing-income-ladder-location-matters.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0.•

__________

Boehm is a retired Indiana Supreme Court justice who previously held senior corporate legal positions and helped launch amateur sports initiatives in Indianapolis. Send comments on this column to ibjedit@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

ADVERTISEMENT