IBJNews

Bosma asks House Ethics Committee to review Turner

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Speaker Brian Bosma asked members of the House Ethics Committee Thursday to determine whether a lawmaker did anything wrong by privately lobbying for his family's nursing home business.

Bosma, R-Indianapolis, wrote a letter to House Ethics Chairman Greg Steuerwald, R-Avon, requesting an investigation into whether Republican Rep. Eric Turner violated any ethics rules.

The Associated Press reported Monday that Turner, R-Cicero, had lobbied other members of the Republican caucus in private last week to block a nursing home ban that would have harmed his son's business. Democratic Party Chairman John Zody asked for an ethics investigation in a letter sent to Bosma Tuesday.

IBJ first reported March 14 that last-minute lobbying unexpectedly killed the legislation.

Bosma also asked the panel to conduct a broader review of House ethics rules.

"I am forwarding this inquiry to your attention to determine whether the Rules of the Indiana House of Representatives, or other applicable authorities, have been violated," Bosma wrote. "If you find a violation, please recommend any actions you feel should be taken."

Even with Bosma's request, it's unclear whether there would be an investigation.

Steuerwald said he would have to talk with other members of the committee before deciding whether to hold a hearing. And if the members do agree to a meeting, he questioned whether anyone would testify because caucus discussions are considered private.

"I don't think we have any means to compel people to comment," Steuerwald said. "This is from a discussion in a private caucus — I mean, geez. As you know Democrats and Republicans have those private caucus meetings every day and getting involved in the discussions that happen in caucus would be. Wow. Those are private and confidential by design."

Emails to Turner and his spokesman were not immediately returned Thursday afternoon. Turner has not commented about his involvement in the nursing home fight since the first reports came out at the start of the week.

Supporters of placing a ban on the construction of new nursing homes argued during the session that it was needed to keep the market from being flooded and Medicaid patients ultimately losing quality health care. But opponents of the ban, including Turner's son and daughter, argued that banning new construction would cost thousands of jobs and tens of millions of dollars in economic impact.

Turner's son, Zeke Turner, is the CEO of Mainstreet Property Group, which is in the process of developing nursing homes throughout the state. Eric Turner's daughter, Jessaca Stults Turner, is Mainstreet's registered lobbyist at the Statehouse.

Turner maintained his neutrality in public through the fight. But behind closed doors, he lobbied against the ban. Republicans with direct knowledge of Turner's efforts told the AP that he spoke out in private caucus meetings on the last two days of session, last Wednesday and Thursday.

Bosma also asked the panel to conduct a broader review of House ethics rules.

"In addition I would request the committee consider whether revisions to our Code of Ethics or statute regarding our Statement of Economic Interest are warranted to give further transparency and openness to the legislative process," he wrote.

Bosma called for an ethics review last spring after the AP reported about Turner's efforts to clear the way for a multimillion-dollar contract for a lobbying and other outlets wrote about state Rep. Matt Ubelhor's interest in the construction of the Rockport coal-gasification plant. But that review had still not happened as of Thursday.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Questions
    The first thing that comes to mind, when I see the Republican-controlled Legislature investigating a high-standing Republican legislator is that this situation is somewhat akin to allowing the inmates to run the asylum (or, prison, if more appropriate). We, as the state's constituents, can only hope that this is not just swept under the proverbial rug, or Mr. Turner manages to wriggle out of this...
  • Fedup
    People's Agenda...2007...Dig deeper...Pay to play payers protected Turner and more for years. Good sources now exposing the drama...Dig Dig Dig...How did they get started in the biz?
  • @ look deeper
    Great information about Turner's voting record. If he only has time to show up for a bill that could affect his family's business, then what is he doing on this committee? Actually, why do the people in his district keep him in office? Time for someone else in that district to run for the office he holds. And I really hope they do investigate him and create a punishment that affects him and isn't just a false slap on the back of his hand.
  • Look Deeper
    While it doesn't prove the allegation at hand, it's interesting to note that a review of the on-line voting records of the House Health Committee shows that Turner was present for the hearing on the nursing home bill, but was not present for almost all of the other bills considered by the committee in 2014. Turner is a member of the House Health Committee. Why did he have time to show up for the nursing home bill when he didn't have time to show up to work on the other bills that passed through the committee during the 2.5 month process?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT