BPG sells trio of Keystone Crossing buildings

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Philadelphia-based BPG Properties Ltd. announced on Monday the sale of a three-building office and retail property near Keystone at the Crossing for $15.5 million.

BPG, a private equity-fund manager, sold 8480, 8500 and 8520 Keystone Crossing to PWA Keystone Crossing LP, an affiliate of Pittsburgh-based PWA Real Estate LLC. The three buildings total 117,276 square feet.

“Despite the challenging market conditions, the asset’s strong occupancy, credit tenancy and diverse tenant mix attracted numerous bidders,” BPG vice president Christopher J. Locatell said in a prepared statement.

The largest of the three buildings, 8500 Keystone Crossing, is 100,353 square feet. BPG acquired the building in 2005. It is 88-percent occupied and houses such tenants General Casualty Co., 20/20 Institute and M/I Homes.

The other two properties, 8480 and 8520 Keystone Crossing, were developed as part of build-to-suit lease transactions for Fidelity Brokerage Services and Jared the Galleria of Jewelry, respectively. The 8480 building totals 7,730 square feet, while 8520 Keystone Crossing totals 9,193 square feet.

BPG was represented in the negotiations by Rebecca Wells, a senior vice president of Cassidy Turley's Indianapolis office.

BPG still owns the six-building, 1 million-square-foot Keystone at the Crossing office complex, which it took full control of in 2006.


  • Occupancy
    I have to figure occupancy rates are terribly overstated at this time. How much space is currently "occupied" simply because the tennat has a 5 - 10 year lease they can't get out of without declaring BK? Unless things change soon, as these leases roll over the next 2 to 3 years, I bet we will see occupancy rates decline. If things pick up, we may get lucky and have them stay flat, but only if average rents come down.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing