IBJNews

Bribery scandals sap Lilly’s China growth

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Eli Lilly and Co. has been counting on torrid growth in China to help offset losses from patent expirations in other markets, but slower growth in the Chinese economy and bribery allegations against Lilly and two other drugmakers have hampered Lilly’s growth there.

The Indianapolis-based drugmaker reported Oct. 23 that its Chinese sales grew 11 percent—down from 14 percent in the first half of the year and a big drop from the 24-percent growth Lilly posted there last year.

Some of that decline is due to a general slowing in the Chinese economy. Gross domestic product grew 7.8 percent in China last year, its lowest level in 13 years, and has been slowing even more this year. Economists polled by Reuters expect growth in China this year of 7.6 percent.

“We saw really two dynamics playing out in China at the moment. One is just the overall slowdown in economic growth in China,” Lilly Chief Financial Officer Derica Rice told analysts during an Oct. 23 conference call. “And the second factor has been the impact of some of the current compliance discussions that are going on in the China marketplace here in the late second and third quarter.”

Those “compliance discussions” stem from three bribery scandals that emerged in China in the middle of the year.

The biggest case involves London-based GlaxoSmithKline plc, whose employees allegedly paid $490 million for spurious travel expenses and traded sexual favors to boost sales among Chinese health care organizations. Chinese authorities unveiled their allegations against GlaxoSmithKline in July, when they also detained four Glaxo employees.

In early August, Paris-based Sanofi-Aventis SA was alleged by a whistleblower to have paid about $280,000 in bribes to 503 doctors in the country.

Two weeks later, a Chinese newspaper reported that Lilly employees gave at least $4.9 million in kickbacks to Chinese doctors to prescribe diabetes drugs in Shanghai and the eastern province of Shanghai. The 21st Century Business Herald based its report on what it called a former senior manager of Lilly, which it referred to by a pseudonym.

Lilly officials said they were “deeply concerned” about the allegations and were investigating them.

Lilly told investors last week that the situation was worst in August, but appeared to improve in September.

“Some physicians seemed to be distancing themselves from MNCs [foreign drugmakers] and showing some reluctance to see MNC [sales] reps in August, which contributed to a challenging August, but September was better,” Lilly officials said in a statement.

Connecticut-based market research firm IMS Health reported that drug sales in China rose 16.8 percent from January through July, but the pace of growth slowed to 8.5 percent in August, according to data provided by Lilly. IMS has yet to release Chinese sales data for September.

Growth in China is critical for Lilly, because its best-selling drug Cymbalta will lose its U.S. patent in December, allowing cheaper generic versions to steal about three-quarters of its more than $5 billion in annual sales.

China provided Lilly more than $500 million in revenue last year—and Lilly’s China sales had doubled over the previous three years.

Rice, Lilly’s CFO, said he expects the sales to rebound from the bribery scandals, although he’s not sure when. Slower growth in China’s economy will be an ongoing challenge, Lilly officials said, but they still expect sales growth to remain in the “high-single-digit” range.

“Like in many other geographies, we have our challenges in China,” said Jacques Tapiero, the outgoing president of Lilly’s emerging-markets business, during an Oct. 3 presentation to investors and analysts. “There will be ups and downs, but the long-term trajectory is very clear and remains very attractive. We remain very committed to China and are fully focused on implementing our plans with high integrity.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

ADVERTISEMENT