IBJNews

BrightPoint shareholder sues company over pending sale

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A BrightPoint Inc. stockholder has filed suit against the company, charging that the $9 share price offered in its $840 million sale to California-based Ingram Micro Inc. is too low.

Hilary Coyne brought the suit July 12 against Indianapolis-based BrightPoint and several of its officers in Marion Superior Court and is seeking class-action status on behalf of all BrightPoint shareholders.

Coyne accuses the company and its officers of breaching their fiduciary duty to shareholders and is asking a judge to issue an injunction to prevent BrightPoint and Ingram from completing the deal. Damages should be awarded if a court judgment is not issued before the sale is complete, the lawsuit says.

The deal is expected to close by the end of the year, the companies said when announcing it on July 2.

BrightPoint, founded in Plainfield in 1989, provides logistics to sellers of wireless devices. It has more than 1,300 employees in the Indianapolis area and 4,000 worldwide.

Santa Ana-based Ingram Micro is set to acquire all outstanding shares of BrightPoint’s common stock for $9 per share in cash. But Coyne argues in her suit that the price is “woefully inadequate” because it’s based on current company conditions that have depressed the price rather than its 52-week high of more than $12 per share.

BrightPoint’s announcement in February that it had lost key customer Cricket Communications Inc. was "exaggerated in the market," the complaint argues, and sent the stock sliding to the $9 range.

BrightPoint’s first-quarter results released in April, however, paint a much brighter picture, the suit said, showing that company revenue increased 23 percent, to nearly $1.4 billion, from the same period in 2011. In addition, BrightPoint handled 29.2 million mobile devices in the first quarter, a 7-percent increase from the first three months last year.

The strong earnings had at least one BrightPoint analyst predicting before the sale announcement that the company’s share price could rebound to $12 in the coming months, the suit said.

BrightPoint stock was fetching $8.90 per share Monday morning, but had fallen as low as $4.50 late last month before the announcement of the sale.

The $9-per-share acquisition price is a 66-percent premium to BrightPoint’s closing price of $5.41 on the Friday before the sale announcement and a 35-percent premium to BrightPoint’s 90-day average trading price.

Coyne further argues that the sale agreement includes a “no solicitation” provision barring BrightPoint officers from soliciting other offers, and a $26 million termination penalty payable to Ingram Micro if BrightPoint backs out on the deal.

“The preferential treatment accorded to Ingram Micro has deprived and will continue to deprive the BrightPoint shareholders of the very substantial premium that unfettered and evenhanded exposure of the company to the market could produce,” the suit said.
 
A BrightPoint officer said a company policy prevented him from commenting on pending litigation.

Coyne is represented by the New York law firm of Gardy & Notis LLP and local counsel Cohen & Malad LLP.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Time to go after CELL
    Brightpoint's officers have become wealthy, especially Bob Laikin, without ever having paid any dividends to its investors. They took as much as they could out of this company for years! Anything that can be done to get more from them or their acquirer is a good move in my opinion.
  • Already
    These law suits never go anywhere and should not even be reported on. Obviously, management felt the price was sufficient to sell. The sale will probably save this investor a bunch of money in the long term. CELL was going nowhere fast.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

    2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

    3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

    4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

    5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...

    ADVERTISEMENT