IBJNews

Brizzi silent on controversy as he opts against 3rd term

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The written statement Carl Brizzi released Thursday saying he will not seek a third term as Marion County prosecutor makes no reference to the controversy surrounding his business and personal ties with embattled Indianapolis financier Tim Durham.

Instead, Brizzi, 41, focused on what he considers his biggest achievements since winning election in 2002. Those include increasing conviction rates and expanding services. He said his office closed 2009 with an overall jury trial conviction rate of 79 percent.

“This decision [not to run] was not an easy one,” Brizzi, a Republican, said in the statement. “But after serving as prosecutor for the last seven years, I have wrestled with the question of whether I can make a commitment to serve an additional five years.”

The last three months have been Brizzi’s rockiest. In November, he acknowledged agreeing to serve on the board of Fair Finance Co., a Durham-owned firm headquartered in Akron, Ohio. He said he began his term in September but quit a month later after Durham informed him IBJ would be publishing an unflattering story about the company’s business practices.

Fair now is at the center of at least two federal investigations. In a November court filing, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Indianapolis accused Durham of running the business as a Ponzi scheme.

Brizzi told IBJ in November that he agreed to serve on the board because he was interested in learning more about finance from Durham, whom he described as “a buddy.” He said that during his stint, he did not take any official action or attend a board meeting.

Durham also has been Brizzi's biggest campaign contributor. Campaign finance records show Durham and his companies have donated more than $200,000 to Brizzi campaigns.

Brizzi also invested in at least two public companies tied to Durham—Dallas-based CLST Holdings Inc. and Los Angeles-based Red Rock Pictures Holdings Inc.

It’s not clear what led Brizzi to either Red Rock or CLST. In a letter to supporters he posted on his Facebook page Dec. 7, Brizzi said he began buying CLST in 2005 “after discussing the investment, as well as other companies, with friends and financial advisers as part of my overall investment planning.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Just because someone supports the project, they are a PR shill for the developer? Myself and everyone I know has no connection whatsoever to any developer. We just want Broad Ripple to move forward and develop, not stay stagnant.

  2. And the failure on the part of Indiana GOP to allow an expansion of Medicaid had nothing to do with Indiana hospitals' financial woes?

  3. It would have been nice if they could have arranged for at least some of Zaxby's menu to be sold at the concession stands as part of the marketing campaign.

  4. Get the feeling Browning has some PR presence on the message board this morning. I don't know a single person in the neighborhood who supports this project.

  5. Grew up in Warfleigh, which is the neighborhood directly across College from the proposed development. I am against the proposed project for several reasons: 1) Traffic Flow -- College is already a mess, especially with the new lane guidance which makes the southbound left lane 'turn only' at Broad Ripple Ave. Not to mention the backups at 64th and College. If this is in fact a Whole Foods, I would expect a steady stream of cars pulling in and out, either off College or 64th Street which are both bad already. 2) Use of TIF funds. I though TIF funds were for under-developed areas, to help bolster property tax rolls for the city. I agree with Barth that this area will do just fine letting market forces dictate what is developed. 3) Specialty Grocer Overkill. There is already a Fresh Market a mile south and a Whole Foods 2 miles north. This store is not needed. Frankly I shocked that the Whole Foods site selection criteria supports a store right here 4) Hurts the Character of the Neighborhood. This type of development, along with the (hideous) parking garage down the street are out of character with the history and fabric of this area. Broad Ripple has succeeded because it was quirky and different. It would be a shame if the city gets involved and helps support ANOTHER project that aims to turn Broad Ripple into some kind of manufactured urban center.

ADVERTISEMENT