IBJNews

Broad Ripple flooding in 2012 becoming costly for city

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The city of Indianapolis faces possibly paying several hundred thousand dollars for a restaurant badly damaged by flooding that swamped a neighborhood during a downpour a year ago.

City officials found that inspectors failed to properly activate an electronic locking system on a pair of White River floodgates that a trespasser had closed two weeks before the May 2012 flooding that left a foot or more of dirty water in parts of the Broad Ripple neighborhood on the city's north side.

The city has paid out more than $82,000 to settle damage claims from several restaurants and other businesses but still has a nearly $650,000 claim pending from Petite Chou restaurant and a $19,000 claim from another restaurant, The Indianapolis Star reported Monday.

Petite Chou owner Martha Hoover said it was a "ground zero" of the flooding. The restaurant's insurance company initially submitted a $200,000 damage claim but the damage was much for extensive.

"We literally had to gut the place," Hoover said. "We had to rebuild everything. It was a disaster."

City spokesman Marc Lotter declined to discuss the matter because of the two pending claims. The other open claim is from Mediterra Restaurant, next to Petite Chou.

The city Department of Public Works found that the closed flood gates prevented the neighborhood's storm sewers from draining into the White River about a quarter mile away when more than an inch of rain fell during the storm.

Changes announced by city officials included the installation of tamperproof locks and increased inspections of the floodgates to prevent a repeat of the flooding.

Larry Marling, the owner of Bogie's Barber Shop, said he was gratified by the increased monitoring of the floodgates and that the city resolved his $8,000 damage claim from the flooding.

"My attorney took care of most everything," Marling said. "Of course, it takes time for them to settle."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • $650,000 renovation???
    This seems like an excessive claim to make against the City.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT