IBJNews

Broad Ripple flooding in 2012 becoming costly for city

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The city of Indianapolis faces possibly paying several hundred thousand dollars for a restaurant badly damaged by flooding that swamped a neighborhood during a downpour a year ago.

City officials found that inspectors failed to properly activate an electronic locking system on a pair of White River floodgates that a trespasser had closed two weeks before the May 2012 flooding that left a foot or more of dirty water in parts of the Broad Ripple neighborhood on the city's north side.

The city has paid out more than $82,000 to settle damage claims from several restaurants and other businesses but still has a nearly $650,000 claim pending from Petite Chou restaurant and a $19,000 claim from another restaurant, The Indianapolis Star reported Monday.

Petite Chou owner Martha Hoover said it was a "ground zero" of the flooding. The restaurant's insurance company initially submitted a $200,000 damage claim but the damage was much for extensive.

"We literally had to gut the place," Hoover said. "We had to rebuild everything. It was a disaster."

City spokesman Marc Lotter declined to discuss the matter because of the two pending claims. The other open claim is from Mediterra Restaurant, next to Petite Chou.

The city Department of Public Works found that the closed flood gates prevented the neighborhood's storm sewers from draining into the White River about a quarter mile away when more than an inch of rain fell during the storm.

Changes announced by city officials included the installation of tamperproof locks and increased inspections of the floodgates to prevent a repeat of the flooding.

Larry Marling, the owner of Bogie's Barber Shop, said he was gratified by the increased monitoring of the floodgates and that the city resolved his $8,000 damage claim from the flooding.

"My attorney took care of most everything," Marling said. "Of course, it takes time for them to settle."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • $650,000 renovation???
    This seems like an excessive claim to make against the City.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT