IBJNews

Broadband provider's legal fight escalates

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The court battle is deepening between Indiana-based Rushville-based Omnicity Corp. and a handful of owners whose companies it acquired.

Omnicity, a provider of wireless broadband services that moved its headquarters from Carmel to Rushville in 2009, has been sued by at least four of the owners, charging that it failed to fully pay them for the acquisitions. All told, the owners say they’re owed more than $1.2 million.

Omnicity, though, is fighting back and has brought counterclaims against two of the owners—the most recent filed in Rush Circuit Court on Wednesday and the other in Ohio in November.

“In both of these cases, we have not gotten what we purchased,” Omnicity CEO Greg Jarman said in a phone interview. “If you don’t get what you pay for, you have to stand up for yourselves.”

The latest countersuit stems from Omnicity’s purchase of the assets of Alexandria-based NDWave LLC in February 2009. Owner Steve Narducci sued Omnicity in September 2010 in Rush Circuit Court, claiming Omnicity owes him $405,911, plus interest, in addition to roughly $6,500 in wages and reimbursements.

Omnicity responded with a host of charges, alleging that Narducci breached his contract and fiduciary duty, committed fraud and conversion, and defamed Omnicity by telling certain companies that it was on the “verge of bankruptcy.”

Omnicity brought Narducci on as its vice president of field services in June 2008, before the acquisition was complete, but terminated his employment in August 2010, according to his complaint.

Narducci, who since has launched a competing company, refuted the charges.

“I figured [the countersuit] was coming, just because they’re mad at me because I had to find a way to make a living again,” he said in a phone interview. “What they’ve done is pretty wrong, and I’m not fearing it much.”

Omnicity’s other countersuit, filed in Ohio, charges that Kyle Yoder, former owner of Digital Network Solutions Inc. in Berlin, Ohio, breached his contract and non-compete clause, in addition to committing conversion.

Yoder agreed to sell the assets of his company to Omnicity in March 2010 for $750,000 in cash at closing. The deal also called for $500,000 to be paid in quarterly installments over four years, and Yoder was to receive $150,000 in company stock.

Omnicity gave him the $700,000, the complaint said, but it failed to pay the first installment of the $500,000 note, triggering a clause in the agreement that made the entire balance due immediately.

Yoder also alleges he is owed additional money, as well as severance, vacation pay and two paychecks after Omnicity fired him as general manager of its Berlin-based operation in July.

Omnicity, meanwhile, claims Yoder hurt Omnicity’s business by failing to pay vendors, refusing to provide Omnicity with terms and conditions of certain customer contracts and failing to secure new customers.

A month after he was fired, Yoder started a new business that triggered the non-compete agreement, Omnicity claims.

The conversion charge stems from allegations by Omnicity that Yoder took $25,000 he claimed was reimbursement for business expenses when in reality he used most of the money for a personal trip to Hawaii.

Yoder referred comment on the counterclaim to his lawyer, who did not return phone calls.

Omnicity faces a third suit, from Peru, Ind.-based North Central Communications Inc., which it also is likely to challenge, Jarman said.

“But the real focus we have are on these first two,” he said, “and we’ll be hitting them vigorously and defending ourselves.”

Meanwhile, a Rush Superior Court judge on Feb. 8 ordered Omnicity to pay $67,500 to the owners of Decatur-based USppp Inc., of which Omnicity purchased the assets in Dec. 2009. Jarman acknowledged the debt and said Omnicity intends to pay it.

Altogether, Omnicity has a working capital deficit of $4.1 million, according to its latest financial statement, filed in December. The company is severely behind in loan payments to a lender, the Muncie Industrial Revolving Loan Fund.  

For its fiscal first quarter ended Oct. 31, the company reported a loss of $244,000 on revenue of $1.3 million, compared with a loss of $400,000 on revenue of $617,000 the same quarter of 2009.

Omnicity has about 12,000 broadband customers in Indiana and Ohio. The company went on an acquisition spree after going public in 2008.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Good info
    Very nice site!
  • Good info
    Very nice site!
  • you got that right
    I am not sure if it is ignorance or dishonesty that caused all the delema with these companies. I worked for one that was bought out and found that the guy in charge was very dishonest in his dealings with me and others. So it is easy for me to see how Omnicity could have been led astray as to exactly what they were buying. Omnicity at least tried to run the business like a real business and I think the companies they bought, at minimum, lacked the intelligence to even think that way. In their mind if they were making money then the company was making money regardless of the way they cheated those around them. Now you see some of these same people starting back up again with cheap junk equipment that breaks regularly setting up the next failure that will likely hurt many in the process. Why would anyone want a wireless service anyway. They have to the most unreliable of the services available out there.
  • OMCY.PK
    HAHA check the warning at the bottom of the article remember OMCY.PK

    http://www.ehow.com/about_7344548__pk-mean-after-stock-symbol_.html
  • Money losers
    It doesn't take a genius to figure out if you buy money-losing businesses, the sum is a money loosing business. NDwave, NCC, all use cheap stuff that has a life of a couple of years. Omnicity bought the equivalent of a used car that had 100k miles on it and now it's broke and needs a new engine + tranny. Good luck. I hope you guys sue the piss out of each other. In the end, we all know what this is about....greed.
    • OMCY
      The lack of knowledge in distinguishing between what is considered an Asset Purchase and a Business Purchase appears to be a major issue with OMCY. If anyone posting here would take the time and read the filings on sec.gov regarding the correspondence between OMCY and the SEC it would be clear what is happening and why OMCY has no choice but to state that all the networks had to be rebuilt and had no value.

      Can assets have a revenue attached to them and not be considered a business purchase?

      If OMCY was diligent they kept detailed logs of all communications prior to, during, and after their acquisitions on behalf of all officers and executives. Any one who would have consulted legal counsel prior to negotiations would have kept all communications in order in expectation of a first material breach on either side.

      What happens if the officials of OMCY, soliciting investors, had knowledge prior to closing on the acquisitions about what they are citing 2 years later created breach and continued operations in the same manner and soliciting investors?

      Its odd how all the reports and articles in the first 18 months after going public talked about how much revenue was generated by the acquisitions and now how much money the acquisitions have cost them. Did OMCY make the acquisitions just to increase their revenue short term to keep operations running and then disregard debt assumed and payment schedules agreed upon during the acquisitions?

      Can a company assume debts from an asset purchase?

      Just a note Greg, you love to talk, have you kept close track of all you have stated? All your colleagues have stated? Hope you haven't exposed yourself for personal legal actions that you'll be paying out of your pocket. That sure would make things rough on the family environment. Guess we will see as things progress and information comes out.

      Keep following the story IBJ. The Investors should really have someone digging in on their behalf if anything is questionable or concerning.
    • FYI-Omnicity
      .
    • NDWave Complaint
      Based on my reading, he started his business while he was still working for the company. Also, does the FCC or SEC have to be reported to on the actions of Narduci. I know customers that had services on the old NDWave network and Omnicity had to replace most of their radios.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

    2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

    3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

    4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

    5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.

    ADVERTISEMENT