IBJNews

Buckingham reviving Gramercy project with smaller plans

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Buckingham Cos. has revived plans to redevelop the massive Mohawk Hills apartment complex in Carmel, but the latest version of its Gramercy project takes a huge step back from the original dense, urban-revival-style plan the developer proposed six years ago.

That’s largely because Buckingham now plans to renovate, rather than demolish, the Mohawk Hills apartment buildings. After redeveloping most of the 116-acre area, Gramercy would have 1,276 residential units, 39 percent fewer than the company planned back in 2006.

Buckingham purchased the property containing 564 apartment units and a nine-hole golf course in 2004 from a Chicago group for roughly $30 million.

Gramercy was envisioned as a $500 million, Manhattan-inspired development that would play into the new-urban style of Carmel's City Center. The City Council had approved up to $20 million in tax-increment financing to pay for new infrastructure.

Buckingham shelved Gramercy in 2008 as the housing market entered its historic slump and Carmel began building six roundabouts along Keystone Avenue. The work would have interfered with access to Gramercy, which is at the southwest corner of Keystone and 126th Street.

Neighbors and City Council members who have seen the latest plan say they like Gramercy’s new suburban flavor.

“They have made great improvements,” said Eric Seidensticker, chairman of the council’s Land Use, Annexation and Economic Development Committee.

Keeping the 1960s-era Mohawk Hills buildings is a significant design change that will require the council’s approval, Seidensticker said. The land use committee will take it up in a special meeting Tuesday evening.

Seidensticker said he hopes Buckingham will commit to eliminating an access road that would have funneled traffic into the Auman/Newark area west of Mohawk Hills.

The original Gramercy proposal was controversial with residents of that neighborhood, located on the west side of Range Line Road between City Center and what would have been a massive redevelopment.

Carmel Mayor James Brainard in 2006 negotiated a 26-percent reduction in scale, but when the project was approved, Buckingham was still planning about 2,100 condo and apartment units, plus new commercial uses.

Buckingham’s new plans, which have lingered before the city’s plan commission for several months, are well-known to Auman/Newark residents, Seidensticker said. Most of those who’ve talked to him about it are happy with the changes, he said.

Seidensticker said he's looking for assurance that Buckingham's renovations will mean more than  “re-skinning” the Mohawk Hills buildings.

The current Gramercy plan leaves the northwest corner of the site empty for “future development.” The original plan called for 50 new homes, so Seidensticker said he hopes to hear more about what might be built there instead.

Buckingham also has scaled down Gramercy’s commercial components. Just two of the new buildings are slated for retail use, and there’s no mention of a hotel or offices.

A Buckingham spokeswoman did not return a message seeking comment, so it’s unclear how soon the company hopes to start work.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Go Buckingham
    Buckingham bought out the company I worked for and fired me and my fellow employee's from a job we were dedicated to for 10 years. They are good at "renovating".

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

  2. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

  3. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

  4. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

  5. I have been in training for a short time now but right off I can see that safety and quality are the number one issues, my experience as of late has been a positive one, the employees along with Jeff the plant manager and the operation supervisor as well as the engineers are a highly motivated group of people, what an asset for the area to have and for company's in need of a quality metal products.

ADVERTISEMENT