Bundle medicine with care

October 31, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Letters To The Editor

I would like to thank IBJ for highlighting the role of interdisciplinary (“bundled”) medicine in the Oct. 19 article, “Huddling on Health Care.” I agree that multi-specialty practices are an effective way to provide individualized care and treat complex conditions.

It is important, however, to recognize that not all specialty centers are created equal. Achieving quality patient care requires that multi-specialty practices treat patients as individuals and not within pre-prescribed or packaged treatment plans. The creation of a unique plan of care—which could include any combination of services available within a practice—by an expert physician is the only true determinant of cost-effectiveness and ensuring the highest-quality outcomes in specialty medicine.

The multi-specialty approach to patient care was available back in the 1990s in the areas of mental health, wound care, cardiac rehab and bariatric medicine in Indianapolis. In fact, I’ve had great success in patient outcomes in my own multi-disciplinary practice where physician care, interventional pain procedures, physical therapy and psychology have been offered under one roof for nearly 20 years. These highly specialized practices should not be considered as a last resort after the “failure” of other physicians to treat a condition, but rather as an expert referral source to primary-care physicians to the most expert care for their patients—in the most efficient and timely manner.

Patients should research each practice to ensure that all of the health care providers are qualified, certified and have prior clinical experience in the specialty area. They should also make sure the clinicians are working together to provide holistic assessments, diagnoses and treatments.


Dr. Ed Kowlowitz

Medical director and founder
Center for Pain Management


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!