IBJNews

California OKs Anthem rate hike after controversy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

State regulators have accepted rate hikes on individual Anthem Blue Cross health insurance policies after public outrage and government scrutiny halted a larger increase.

The California Department of Insurance said Wednesday it approved a rate increase averaging about 14 percent for Anthem Blue Cross customers. The department also approved a nearly 19-percent increase for Blue Shield of California.

Anthem, a subsidiary of Indianapolis-based Wellpoint Inc. and the California's largest for-profit insurer, had previously requested a boost that would have raised rates as much as 39 percent for some customers, with average increases of about 25 percent.

But regulators found accounting errors in the proposal and Anthem retracted the filing, which would have affected about 700,000 individual policies regulated by the commissioner. Another 100,000 individual policies are regulated by the state's other insurance regulator, the Department of Managed Healthcare.

Anthem's rate hike was repeatedly criticized by President Barack Obama as an example of a broken health care system in the run-up to the vote on federal health care reform.

The smaller increase announced Wednesday was expected to save consumers $184 million, Department of Insurance spokesman Ioannis Kazanis said.

Anthem spokeswoman Kristin Binns said in a written statement the company "is pleased that the department has posed no objections to our individual rate filings and we look forward to continuing to serve consumers in California."

Not-for-profit insurer Blue Shield of California's rate hike will affect more than 247,000 policyholders.

"We wish it were a much smaller increase, but this is unfortunately what we're paying out to hospitals, doctors and pharmaceutical companies to pay the cost of the claims of these members," said Tom Epstein, spokesman for Blue Shield.

Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner instituted independent reviews of the top four insurers in the state in June to help keep the companies in line with California law mandating 70 percent of income be used for medical treatment of policyholders.

The rate hikes by Anthem and Blue Shield underwent independent reviews that were released Wednesday and found the two major insurers to be in compliance with the law.

Anthony Wright, executive director of Health Access, a not-for-profit advocacy group for consumers, said state regulators need better control over the rate hike approval process. Two bills currently being considered by the Legislature — AB2578 and SB1163 — would strengthen the authority of insurance regulators, he said.

"The fact that Anthem had to pull back and reduce their rate hike shows that public oversight can work, but we're not going to have the presidential spotlight on every future rate increase," Wright said.

Providers must give 30 days notice to policyholders before increasing rates.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Because they are the only bad guys
    Hector - go survey the hospitals and doctors in California and across this country if they see double digit reimbursement increases annually. If any hospital is in the press for getting such an increase in one year it is going to be because the insurance company did not give them any increases for multiple years prior to that.
  • Why the only bad guy?
    Why do only the ones paying for the skyward costs of health care - the insurance companies - get scalded when the raise their prices?

    What about the doctors, hospitals, etc.? Why do they get a free pass when they jack up their rates?

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. OK Larry, let's sign Lance, shore up the PG and let's get to the finals.

    2. A couple of issues need some clarification especially since my name was on the list. I am not sure how this information was obtained and from where. For me, the amount was incorrect to begin with and the money does not come to me personally. I am guessing that the names listed are the Principal Investigators (individual responsible for the conduct of the trail) for the different pharmaceutical trials and not the entity which receives the checks. In my case, I participate in Phase II and Phase III trials which are required for new drug development. Your article should differentiate the amount of money received for consulting, for speaking fees, and for conduct of a clinical trial for new drug development. The lumping of all of these categories may give the reader a false impression of physicians just trying to get rich. The Sunshine Law may help to differentiate these categories in the future. The public should be aware that the Clinical Trial Industry could be a real economic driver for Indiana since these revenues supports jobs and new job creation. Nationally, this account for 10-20 billion which our State is missing out on to a large degree. Yes, new drug and technology development has gotten most of the attention (e.g. CTSI, BioCrossroads, etc.) However, serious money is being left on the table by not participating in the clinical trials to get those new drugs and medical devices on the market!!!! I guess that this is not sexy enough for academia.

    3. The address given for the Goldfish Swim Club is the Ace Hardware, is it closing?

    4. Out of state management and ownership. If Kite controlled it, everything would be leased. Of course, due to the roundabout, there is limited access to the south side of 116th now also. Just have to go down to the light.

    5. Hey smudge, You're opposed to arresting people for minor crimes? Sounds great! We should only focus on murders and such, right? Let's stand around and wait until someone shoots someone before we act. Whatever we do, we should never question anyone, frisk anyone, or arrest anyone unless they are actively engaged in shooting or stabbing. Very sound!

    ADVERTISEMENT