IBJNews

Centaur wins approval to sell Colorado casino

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Casino and racetrack operator Centaur LLC has been authorized to sell the Fortune Valley Hotel & Casino 40 miles west of Denver.

The buyer, Luna Gaming Central City LLC, is paying $7.5 million in cash plus a $2.5 million note, less adjustments. There were no competing bids.

Centaur filed a revised reorganization plan on July 22 in which holders of $405 million in first-lien debt are slated to recover 83.3 percent from a combination of mostly new stock and debt. Holders of $207 million in second-lien debt are in line for a 1.4-percent recovery, according to the disclosure statement filed along with the plan.

Centaur, which which nearly three years ago was flying high after attracting $1 billion in investments, doesn’t believe that its assets are worth enough to pay first-lien debt in full.

Centaur LLC and 12 affiliates filed Chapter 11 petitions in March. Affiliates Centaur PA Land LP and Valley View Downs LP filed for bankruptcy reorganization in October to keep alive a project to develop a racetrack in Pennsylvania. All the companies are subsidiaries of closely held Centaur Inc., which is not in bankruptcy.

The March filings listed assets of $584 million and debt of $681 million. The newer cases resulted from the failure to make payments due in October on a $382.5 million first-lien debt and a $192 million second-lien credit. The companies have horse racing and gambling facilities in five markets in Indiana and Colorado. They were developing a property in Pennsylvania to be called Valley View Downs and Casino 55 miles from Pittsburg.

The companies own Hoosier Park, an Indiana casino and horse racetrack in Anderson, along with three offtrack betting parlors in Indiana. In addition, they own Fortune Valley Hotel & Casino in Central City, Colo., which has a 118-room hotel to complement the casino. The companies generated revenue of $277.5 million in 2009.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT