IBJNews

Central Indiana biodiesel producer files for bankruptcy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A biodiesel producer located east of Anderson has declared bankruptcy, citing $17.3 million in debts.

E-biofuels LLC in Middletown filed for Chapter 7 liquidation on April 4. The company lists $11.4 million in assets consisting of equipment and property.

Secured liabilities include loans in the amount of $7.4 million from First Merchants Bank in Muncie, $3 million from Ultra Green Energy Services in Chicago and $1.5 million from Ciena Capital LLC in Greenville, S.C.

E-biofuels began operating in 2007 and had the capacity to produce 10 million gallons of biodiesel per year, according to the Indiana Department of Agriculture.

Whether the company ever came close to producing that amount is unclear. A federal lawsuit filed in 2008 against E-biofuels by Houston-based Vinmar Overseas Ltd. suggests it didn't.

A federal judge ordered E-biofuels to pay Vinmar $930,546 for its claim that E-biofuels failed to supply it 500,000 gallons of biodiesel. E-biofuels paid off the judgment in 2011, the bankruptcy filing said.

Biodiesel is a renewable fuel manufactured from vegetable oils, animal fats or recycled restaurant greases. It can be used as a diesel fuel or mixed with regular diesel to be used in diesel vehicles.

Indiana has four remaining biodiesel plants, in Kosciusko, Lake, LaPorte and Shelby counties, that together are capable of producing more than 100 million gallons of the fuel annually.

Including the E-biofuels plant, the five biodiesel facilities were expected to create 620 jobs in the state, according to the Department of Agriculture.

E-biofuels is owned by Evansville-based Imperial Petroleum Inc, whose subsidiaries include Arrakis Oil Recovery LLC and Ridgepointe Mining Co. Shares of the thinly traded public company are fetching 9 cents each.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Ignorance is no excuse
    H Wilson,

    Biodiesel does not "use up our nation's food supply" - nor does ethanol, really for that matter, but biodiesel and ethanol are completely different in size, scope, and impact to farming in general.
  • Excellent News!
    This is excellent news for the average person. One less biofuel plant burning up our food supply and raising our food prices. I hope this is just the start and that all the other biodiesel and corn ethanol plants will soon go bankrupt also -- they deserve it for milking the taxpayer for subsidies and burning up all our nations food.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

    ADVERTISEMENT