IBJNews

Central Indiana home sales continue to trail 2013

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Home-sale agreements declined 13.8 percent in the nine-county area in July, the 11th straight month deals have decreased.

Pending sales of existing homes dropped from 2,725 in July 2013 to 2,350 in July 2014, real estate agency F.C. Tucker Co. reported Monday morning. Sales for the first seven months of the year are down 10.7 percent from the first seven months of 2013.

“Last year’s sales were historic—the fourth best year in Indianapolis real estate history—as the market continued its recovery from the economic downturn,” said Jim Litten, president of F.C. Tucker Co., in a prepared release. “Although this year’s sales appear less dramatic, they are still solid and signal that progress will likely be more subtle moving forward.”

Area home prices continued to rise. The average year-to-date sale price in July for the metropolitan area was $175,566, a 6.5-percent jump from $164,926 in July 2013.

Pending sales were down in seven of the area’s nine counties in July, compared with the same month last year. Marion County, by far the most active market, saw a 17.8-percent drop in sale agreements, from 1,147 in July 2013 to 943 last month.

The average year-to-date sale price in the county has grown 7 percent, from $127,884 in 2013 to $136,773 this year.

The area’s second most active market, Hamilton County, felt a 16.8-percent blow to pending sales, sliding from 625 in July 2013 to 520 last month.  The average year-to-date sale price grew from $249,052 to $265,650.

Other big declines in pended sales came in Boone County, dropping 26.4 percent, from 106 homes to 78, and in Morgan County, where agreements sank 17.8 percent, from 101 to 83.

Among the two gainers, Shelby County led the pack with a 55.9-percent jump, to 53 homes.

Eight homes priced between $1 million and $2 million sold in central Indiana in July. Sixty-four fell in the range of $500,000 to $999,999. About 47 percent of the pended sales in the area (1,108) took place in the $100,000 to $199,999 price range.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

  2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

  3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

  4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

  5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT