IBJNews

Centre Properties retail center hit with $7M foreclosure suit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based developer Centre Properties is the target of another foreclosure suit, this one involving Pyramid Place Shoppes, a retail center on the northwest side.

Citigroup Mortgage Lending Trust, or CMLT, filed the complaint in Marion Superior Court late last month and is seeking $7.2 million. A hearing has been set for Aug. 16 to appoint a receiver to manage the property until it is sold.

The 52,400-square-foot Pyramid Place Shoppes is at the busy intersection of West 86th Street and Michigan Road. Its tenants include multiple eateries, including Outback Steakhouse, Noodles & Co., Firehouse Subs, Skyline Chili and Qdoba.

The suit said the $7 million loan to Centre Properties’ subsidiary Pyramid Place Shops LLC originated with LaSalle Bank in August 2007 and was assigned to Bank of America the following year. The mortgage eventually ended up with CMLT.

CMLT sent a default notice to Centre Properties in April this year, seeking $7.2 million, including interest on the loan.

Centre Properties was founded in 1985 by Craig W. Johnson and James F. Singleton. Neither returned phone calls seeking comment on the foreclosure filing. Their company has developed more than 2.2 million square feet of retail space in the Indianapolis area, according to its website.

But Centre Properties has encountered problems with lenders. In November, U.S. Bank filed a foreclosure suit in Marion Superior Court against subsidiary Centre East LLC, seeking $43.3 million stemming from a 2005 loan.

The three properties involved in that suit were the 130,000-square-foot Centre North Shops at 8510 E. 96th St. in Fishers, the 17,900-square-foot Southport Shops at 7225 U.S. 31 South, and the 13,300-square-foot German Church Shops at 10935 E. Washington St.

The properties are being sold at a sheriff sale, according to court documents.

Centre Properties is among a long list of retail developers hit with foreclosure lawsuits in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis.

“It is very difficult to get refinancing on multi-tenant shopping centers,” said Eric Hillenbrand, an independent commercial real estate broker. “The terms and conditions are very different than they were when a loan might have originated.”

He said Centre Properties’ Pyramid Place Shops is well-occupied and in an attractive location near large office parks and bigger retailers, including Walmart and Sam's Club.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. You are correct that Obamacare requires health insurance policies to include richer benefits and protects patients who get sick. That's what I was getting at when I wrote above, "That’s because Obamacare required insurers to take all customers, regardless of their health status, and also established a floor on how skimpy the benefits paid for by health plans could be." I think it's vital to know exactly how much the essential health benefits are costing over previous policies. Unless we know the cost of the law, we can't do a cost-benefit analysis. Taxes were raised in order to offset a 31% rise in health insurance premiums, an increase that paid for richer benefits. Are those richer benefits worth that much or not? That's the question we need to answer. This study at least gets us started on doing so.

  2. *5 employees per floor. Either way its ridiculous.

  3. Jim, thanks for always ready my stuff and providing thoughtful comments. I am sure that someone more familiar with research design and methods could take issue with Kowalski's study. I thought it was of considerable value, however, because so far we have been crediting Obamacare for all the gains in coverage and all price increases, neither of which is entirely fair. This is at least a rigorous attempt to sort things out. Maybe a quixotic attempt, but it's one of the first ones I've seen try to do it in a sophisticated way.

  4. In addition to rewriting history, the paper (or at least your summary of it) ignores that Obamacare policies now must provide "essential health benefits". Maybe Mr Wall has always been insured in a group plan but even group plans had holes you could drive a truck through, like the Colts defensive line last night. Individual plans were even worse. So, when you come up with a study that factors that in, let me know, otherwise the numbers are garbage.

  5. You guys are absolutely right: Cummins should build a massive 80-story high rise, and give each employee 5 floors. Or, I suppose they could always rent out the top floors if they wanted, since downtown office space is bursting at the seams (http://www.ibj.com/article?articleId=49481).

ADVERTISEMENT