IBJNews

ChaCha may drop T-Mobile over planned fee

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The CEO of Carmel-based ChaCha is threatening to drop T-Mobile’s wireless service over the carrier’s plan to impose a new fee on text messages.

T-Mobile has said it will begin charging a fee of one-quarter of 1 cent on each text message beginning Oct. 1.  

Known as the “world’s leading answers service,” ChaCha allows wireless phone users to call in or text their questions to ChaCha’s ranks of human guides at no charge.

T-Mobile subscribers account for only about 10 percent of ChaCha’s traffic, said CEO Scott Jones, who downplayed the effect of its potential plan to drop the carrier.

“Therefore, the impact of discontinuing service to T-Mobile is negligible to ChaCha,” he said via e-mail. “While we aren’t happy about it, it was an easy decision for us.”

Still, Jones said the fee would stifle innovation and could set a dangerous precedent. If Twitter was forced to endure such a fee from all carriers, it would pay about $50 million annually based on its text traffic, Jones said.

ChaCha will continue to serve customers with other wireless services such as AT&T, Sprint and Verizon, Jones said. Fans of the answer service can also gain access through other channels, such as the World Wide Web.

“For ChaCha, this is a business issue,” he said. “We have a work-around to reduce the burden of this ‘tax.’ But, T-Mobile is giving [its] subscribers reasons to consider other carriers.”

The new fee actually would be charged to ChaCha’s aggregator, OpenMarket, which would pass on the fee to the company. Aggregators are middlemen that work between content publishers like ChaCha, Twitter and Facebook and the mobile subscribers they send content to.

ChaCha makes money by embedding advertisements in the answers. Advertisers, including giants such as McDonalds Corp. and Procter & Gamble, pay only when users respond by clicking through to the text ads ChaCha users receive with their answers.  

For most of its existence, ChaCha has been unable to turn a profit. That changed in December, when it became “gross profit positive,” meaning the company is making more per query than it is spending on its tens of thousands of guides that respond to the text messages.

T-Mobile's fee may be just the latest challenge for the fast-growing digital startup. Last month, the popular social media site Facebook launched a question-and-answer service that could cut in on ChaCha’s revenue rhythm.

Facebook Questions won’t incur the cost of paying 30,000-plus independent contract employees as does ChaCha because it will rely on other users to provide answers. ChaCha's human guides earn 2 cents to 20 cents per answer, depending on whether they’re merely screening queries or conducting heavy research.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

ADVERTISEMENT