IBJNews

Challenger alleges misconduct in Westfield mayoral race

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Russell Cameron, who is challenging Westfield Mayor Andy Cook in a May 3 Republican primary, accused Cook’s deputy mayor of improperly using his position and city resources to campaign for Cook’s reelection.

Cameron’s complaint, sent Monday to the Hamilton County Prosecutor’s Office, has since been forwarded to the Indiana State Police, according to Cameron.

Cameron argues that Bruce Hauk, Westfield’s deputy mayor, functions as a city manager because he is the chief administrative officer of the city. Yet Indiana law does not allow a city manager to engage in political campaigning.

Cameron’s complaint accuses Hauk of working on campaign activities during city business hours, using his city vehicle for campaign purposes and pressuring city staff to hold political events at their homes.

Cook, in an interview, confirmed that Hauk is a volunteer for his campaign but countered that Hauk does not qualify as a city manager under Indiana law.

“It’s an entirely different form of government,” Cook said of Westfield, which became a city in 2008, with Cook as its first mayor.

Cook called the filing of the complaint “despicable behavior” and “purely political.”

“This gentleman who is my opponent is taking some drastic steps to create momentum in his campaign which he cannot from the minimal amount of supporters that he has,” Cook said.

Cameron said the prosecutor's office would not have forwarded his complaint unless it had some merit. He said his complaints about Hauk are part of a pattern of the Cook administration looking for ways to circumvent the law.

"This is typical of the Cook administration," Cameron said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Shocked!
    So, is anyone surprised that Hamilton County Republicans break the law first, then claim ignorance and call it an unintentional error afterwards? Thanks Charlie White, for leading the way!
  • Resident of Westfield
    Mayor Cook runs this City like his own private kingdom. Regardless of whether Hauk is a "manager", he is using his position as a City employee to influence the election and City politics.

    Drive through Westfield and notice all the Cook election signes posted on property that is under contract to be bought by the City in deals struck by Mayor Cook.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

  2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

  3. Straight No Chaser

  4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

  5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.

ADVERTISEMENT