IBJNews

Chamber to merge with economic development groups

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The Greater Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce will lead economic development efforts for central Indiana as the result of a merger between four organizations approved Thursday.

The chamber will merge with Develop Indy, the economic development group for Marion County, as well as Indy Partnership and Business Ownership Initiative, the groups announced.

Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard and leaders of the four organizations approved the merger.

The merger has been in the works since Scott Miller, the former head of Develop Indy, became the chamber president in October. The proposed merger didn’t sit well with some members of the Indy Partnership, which represents surrounding counties.

But Miller said he thinks the merger will result in more money spent on marketing the city and region, as well as more economic development representatives out in the field, rather than doing administrative tasks. Indy Chamber’s revenue, about $5 million in 2011, will probably rise to $8 million to $10 million after the merger, he said Thursday. “We are actually hoping to grow those dollars.”

The chamber will grow from 30 employees to 50, he said.

The chamber has nearly 3,000 business members representing 235,000 employees in central Indiana, making it one of the largest regional chambers of commerce in the country.

Denver, Louisville, Nashville and Houston all have combined chambers of commerce and economic development organizations, according to Indy Chamber.

Each of the merged organizations will operate as a business unit of the chamber. Develop Indy is the largest of the three, with $2.9 million in revenue in 2010, according to the most recent tax information. Its not-for-profit board of directors was appointed by Ballard, and a large part of its funding has come from the Indianapolis Bond Bank.

“Aligning the strategic resources of these organizations with those of the chamber will better position our efforts to attract new jobs and grow existing companies,” Ballard said in a prepared statement. “The organizations’ shared goals of economic vitality and success for Indianapolis will only strengthen as we move forward in building a better future for our Hoosier work force.”

Indy Partnership has technically been part of Develop Indy, but it will become a separately operated and branded business unit, Miller said.

The Business Ownership Initiative, another division of Develop Indy that works with start-ups and provides micro loans, will also become a separate business unit.

All three of the merged organizations and the chamber have their offices in the Chase Tower in downtown Indianapolis. Miller said the transition team will be looking at future office space.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Explain please
    I guess I don't see the politics involved.
  • Why stop here
    Why isn't the Central Indiana Corporate Partnership and Greater Indianapolis Progress Committee included in this consolidation?


  • way off target.
    My Not surprized. You have taken some great organizations. And turned them into politics. Col. Lilly is turning in is grave. Quoting former Mayor Hudnut. Check your politcs at the door. It is about the city. I thought it was about business. No it is just politics. A sad day in Indy. Oh ya next time you send a survey. I.e. The Chamber. Why send to ask our opinion. When you have already made a choice. We are not Nashville.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

    2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

    3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

    4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

    5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

    ADVERTISEMENT