IBJOpinion

Children need broad education

January 22, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Letters To The Editor

I applaud Bruce Hetrick’s column (Jan. 10, “Why this public-school baby fears school reform”) for its keen observations about the value of education in the arts and humanities. We subscribers and readers have had the good fortune of seeing similar insights shared by columnists Morton Marcus and Frank Basile over the years.

Hetrick rightly points out the gains that students realize from learning in subjects and disciplines that feature complexity, creativity, the presence of multiple points of view, and the opportunity for multiple interpretations. The social value of this education—to say nothing of the personal intellectual growth it fosters—is not only great but growing. As many have observed, the 21st century already is and will continue to be a time when innovation and creativity, and the capabilities to deal with complexity and diversity, are drivers of economic and social progress.

The arts and humanities—and I think it is important to add the social sciences—are critical to our and our students’ future success for an additional reason, and that is the globalization of economic and other forms of human interaction. Employers need people who—in addition to their workplace roles and skills—can communicate and form relationships all over the world. We want people whom we can send anywhere to represent us—via airplane or via Skype—and who know enough about the geography, history, culture, politics and government, and economy of those places to interact effectively and productively.

And facility in additional languages has never been more important. As many employers have commented and many surveys of employers have found, employers are perfectly willing to train employees in job-specific tasks and skills; what they need are people who come to the workplace able to communicate effectively, interact constructively with others within and outside the workplace, and find their way around in the world. Those are not the skills employers want to be responsible for supplying; that’s what they want schools (and especially colleges and universities) to do.

Promoting and expanding the education of young people in the arts, humanities and social sciences in addition to mathematics and the physical sciences is vital for the future of Indianapolis. Thanks to IBJ for keeping that viewpoint prominent in our civic discussions of education and its improvement.

William Blomquist
Dean
Indiana University School of Liberal Arts, IUPUI
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT