IBJOpinion

Children need broad education

January 22, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
IBJ Letters To The Editor

I applaud Bruce Hetrick’s column (Jan. 10, “Why this public-school baby fears school reform”) for its keen observations about the value of education in the arts and humanities. We subscribers and readers have had the good fortune of seeing similar insights shared by columnists Morton Marcus and Frank Basile over the years.

Hetrick rightly points out the gains that students realize from learning in subjects and disciplines that feature complexity, creativity, the presence of multiple points of view, and the opportunity for multiple interpretations. The social value of this education—to say nothing of the personal intellectual growth it fosters—is not only great but growing. As many have observed, the 21st century already is and will continue to be a time when innovation and creativity, and the capabilities to deal with complexity and diversity, are drivers of economic and social progress.

The arts and humanities—and I think it is important to add the social sciences—are critical to our and our students’ future success for an additional reason, and that is the globalization of economic and other forms of human interaction. Employers need people who—in addition to their workplace roles and skills—can communicate and form relationships all over the world. We want people whom we can send anywhere to represent us—via airplane or via Skype—and who know enough about the geography, history, culture, politics and government, and economy of those places to interact effectively and productively.

And facility in additional languages has never been more important. As many employers have commented and many surveys of employers have found, employers are perfectly willing to train employees in job-specific tasks and skills; what they need are people who come to the workplace able to communicate effectively, interact constructively with others within and outside the workplace, and find their way around in the world. Those are not the skills employers want to be responsible for supplying; that’s what they want schools (and especially colleges and universities) to do.

Promoting and expanding the education of young people in the arts, humanities and social sciences in addition to mathematics and the physical sciences is vital for the future of Indianapolis. Thanks to IBJ for keeping that viewpoint prominent in our civic discussions of education and its improvement.

William Blomquist
Dean
Indiana University School of Liberal Arts, IUPUI
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT