IBJNews

Chrysler drives off with $2.5M refund from Duke Energy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Chrysler Group LLC has proved it’s of sufficient financial caliber to be a Duke Energy Indiana customer, saying the utility has finally refunded a $2.5 million security deposit that was used to ensure electric service at its Kokomo transmission plant following the automaker’s 2009 bankruptcy.

Chrysler filed a complaint with the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission on July 5, saying Duke Energy “is the only public utility in North America still holding a security deposit from Chrysler.”

The automaker complained Duke resisted returning the $2.5 million deposit even after its finances improved, including 32 months of a “clean payment history.” Chrysler attorney Todd Richardson, of Indianapolis law firm Lewis & Kappes, argued that Duke was taking a “draconian” approach in its deposit rules.

He also noted that Chrysler added nearly 1,000 jobs at Kokomo since the 2009 bankruptcy filing. The plant employs about 3,500.

In a filing with the commission late last month, Chrysler said that Duke had refunded the seven-figure deposit, plus an undisclosed amount of interest, “upon review of Chrysler’s most recently published financial reports and further discussions with Chrysler."

The automaker posted a second-quarter profit of $346 million versus a loss of $370 million in the same quarter last year, when it paid off $551 million in federal loans.

“Chrysler reported its second-quarter results after its IURC filing was made, and the company has demonstrated a strong financial trend. Based on its performance, we agreed to fully refund the company’s security deposit,” said Duke spokeswoman Angeline Protogere.

Chrysler filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization in April 2009 and agreed to sell most of its assets, including its Kokomo transmission manufacturing factories, to a new entity partly owned by Italy’s Fiat SpA. As a result, according to Chrysler's complaint, Duke said it would regard Chrysler as a new customer and demanded a security deposit.

Duke had responded that it was simply using a deposit policy designed to minimize overall costs to all its customers.

“Duke Energy retains its right to request and obtain future customer deposits from Chrysler should they become warranted, and Chrysler retains its right to contest any future requests for customer deposits,” according to Chrysler’s recent filing withdrawing the complaint.

“Chrysler Group is pleased this matter has been resolved. Our company is achieving great success with our new products and Chrysler Group’s plan to invest more than a billion dollars in its Kokomo operations is strong indication of our financial performance and commitment to economic development in the state of Indiana,” said Chrysler spokesman Michael Palese.

Chrysler said it has $12.1 billion of cash on hand.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT