IBJNews

Chrysler drives off with $2.5M refund from Duke Energy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Chrysler Group LLC has proved it’s of sufficient financial caliber to be a Duke Energy Indiana customer, saying the utility has finally refunded a $2.5 million security deposit that was used to ensure electric service at its Kokomo transmission plant following the automaker’s 2009 bankruptcy.

Chrysler filed a complaint with the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission on July 5, saying Duke Energy “is the only public utility in North America still holding a security deposit from Chrysler.”

The automaker complained Duke resisted returning the $2.5 million deposit even after its finances improved, including 32 months of a “clean payment history.” Chrysler attorney Todd Richardson, of Indianapolis law firm Lewis & Kappes, argued that Duke was taking a “draconian” approach in its deposit rules.

He also noted that Chrysler added nearly 1,000 jobs at Kokomo since the 2009 bankruptcy filing. The plant employs about 3,500.

In a filing with the commission late last month, Chrysler said that Duke had refunded the seven-figure deposit, plus an undisclosed amount of interest, “upon review of Chrysler’s most recently published financial reports and further discussions with Chrysler."

The automaker posted a second-quarter profit of $346 million versus a loss of $370 million in the same quarter last year, when it paid off $551 million in federal loans.

“Chrysler reported its second-quarter results after its IURC filing was made, and the company has demonstrated a strong financial trend. Based on its performance, we agreed to fully refund the company’s security deposit,” said Duke spokeswoman Angeline Protogere.

Chrysler filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization in April 2009 and agreed to sell most of its assets, including its Kokomo transmission manufacturing factories, to a new entity partly owned by Italy’s Fiat SpA. As a result, according to Chrysler's complaint, Duke said it would regard Chrysler as a new customer and demanded a security deposit.

Duke had responded that it was simply using a deposit policy designed to minimize overall costs to all its customers.

“Duke Energy retains its right to request and obtain future customer deposits from Chrysler should they become warranted, and Chrysler retains its right to contest any future requests for customer deposits,” according to Chrysler’s recent filing withdrawing the complaint.

“Chrysler Group is pleased this matter has been resolved. Our company is achieving great success with our new products and Chrysler Group’s plan to invest more than a billion dollars in its Kokomo operations is strong indication of our financial performance and commitment to economic development in the state of Indiana,” said Chrysler spokesman Michael Palese.

Chrysler said it has $12.1 billion of cash on hand.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Doug Henning!

  2. These guy were thugs — they grew up in freaking Haughville! Smh, sigh. If the mayor needs/wants "quality" Black Hoosiers who are NOT corrupt, give me a call — I know plenty. Land bank info here - http://www.kubepharm.com/indylandbank/IndyLandBank.html

  3. Magician and illusionist!

  4. The basic idea of nice apartments with parking and retail is a good one, but this design seems overwhelmingly big/tall for Broad Ripple. The size could be disguised a bit with lots of big trees/landscaping, but the complex is too massive to blend in easily. That section of canal between College and Westfield will also need to be upgraded on both sides. Nice apartments facing onto a nice promenade with shade trees/plantings could bring together the canal towpath/Monon recreation, the outdoor seating at existing restaurants, and this project into something that upgrades the whole area. A plan for the whole stretch makes more sense than facing nice new housing onto what looks like a ditch. Is there a plan? Does the public have input? Who pays? The apartment idea seems to be reasonable, but Whole Foods is not a good idea for appropriate retail. Besides the store being physically too big, there are already Fresh Market at 54xCollege and Whole Foods in Nora for fancy groceries. Good Earth and Kroger are within walking distance of the Shell site. There are at least 7 grocery stores within a safe bike ride. Whole Foods would add nothing but traffic congestion. This design is on the right track, but there needs to be more work done to ensure that it blends in with and enhances the existing community. A project that large will set a tone for that whole part of town. It could be a real asset, but only if done right.

  5. I did not move to Zionsville to live in Carmel. This and the subsequent developments to follow will ensure a vanilla uniformity of strip malls and apartment buildings as we seek to bring our town down to the least common denominator. We were warned before recent elections that pro-development council members would make sure their friends (landowners and developers) would be able to make their millions off of the exploitation of Zionsville. Why in God's name would we sell out the best preserved small town in the State of Indiana?

ADVERTISEMENT