IBJNews

Circle Centre vies to keep anchor stores

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Circle Centre mall, the herculean development effort widely credited with launching downtown’s rebirth, will be 15 years old in September.

The key to a Sweet 16th could be finding a way to hold onto anchor stores Nordstrom and Carson Pirie Scott. Deals for both the 210,000-square-foot Nordstrom and the 144,000-square-foot Carson Pirie Scott, originally a Parisian, are up for renewal in the coming months.

Officials at locally based Simon Property Group Inc., which developed the mall and owns about 15 percent of it, are leading the negotiations with Seattle-based Nordstrom Inc. and York, Pa.-based The Bon-Ton Stores Inc., parent of Carson’s.

Meanwhile, city officials are preparing to step in and do whatever it takes to ensure the mall anchors remain, said Michael Huber, deputy mayor for economic development.

Circle Centre Keeping Nordstrom is critical for Circle Centre mall, former Mayor Bill Hudnut says. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

“Keeping Carson Pirie Scott and Nordstrom and a healthy, functioning mall is of critical importance,” Huber said. “We’re fortunate with the management of Simon Property Group the mall is doing as well as it is at a time when many downtown malls are not.”

Huber said he wasn’t sure exactly when the department store deals are up for renewal, but believes it’s next year.

It isn’t clear what incentives the city might offer since Simon has not yet made a request; the city originally enticed Nordstrom to open in the $319 million mall by offering a new building and tenant improvements at no upfront cost to the retailer. How much Nordstrom pays in rent is not spelled out in publicly available documents. Carson’s occupies part of the first three floors of the former L.S. Ayres flagship department store.

Anchor tenants are considered paramount to attracting shoppers to a mall’s smaller stores, so advantageous deals are not unusual.

Sitehawk Retail Real Estate principal Mark Perlstein said he’s confident Simon will secure a renewal of the Nordstrom deal.

“I would be very surprised if Nordstrom closed that store,” he said. “I think it’s a good store for them.”

Carson’s could be another story, Perlstein said. The fact that it’s the chain’s only store in the market makes it inefficient for advertising purposes. And if the store departs, it could make way for another retailer such as Target or Best Buy to finally penetrate a downtown market they’ve been eyeing for years.

Nordstrom spokesman Colin Johnson said the store’s operating covenant, an agreement that requires the store to stay open for business, will be up for negotiation soon. But he said it’s not unusual for the chain to run a store without such an agreement.

“We love serving our Indianapolis customers and there’s been no change in the status of our downtown store,” Johnson said in an e-mail.

Officials with Simon and Bon-Ton did not respond to IBJ questions for this story.

It was Simon’s relationship with the upscale Nordstrom that brought the store to Circle Centre back in 1995, said former Indianapolis Mayor Bill Hudnut, a key figure in the mall’s development.

Circle Centre—and its anchors—have supported the city’s core, bolstered the convention business, provided jobs, and inspired other investments downtown, he said.

“It might be the equivalent of losing the Pacers if we lose Nordstrom,” Hudnut said. “To my thinking, the mall is one of the linchpins of the whole downtown, and Nordstrom is the mall’s linchpin.”

Circle Centre already has beaten the odds by escaping the fate of other similar downtown mall projects, including one in Columbus, Ohio, which are plagued by vacancies and a failure to retain anchor stores.

The downtown Indianapolis mall generated a profit of $8.9 million last year on revenue of more than $23 million, records show. Occupancy held steady in 2008 and 2009 at 92.8 percent, excluding the troubled fourth floor, which is only 59-percent occupied.

Circle Centre tableThe vacancy-plagued fourth floor—most of which Simon still hopes to convert into office space—isn’t the only troublesome issue for the 790,000-square-foot mall. Circle Centre’s $330 in sales per square foot for stores under 10,000 square feet in 2009 is well below the $433 average across Simon’s 382-mall portfolio.

And the two-year drop in sales per square foot at Circle Centre has been dramatic: The figure fell almost 19 percent from 2007 to 2009, from $406 to $330, outpacing a drop of 12 percent across the entire portfolio.

Simon provided the figures in an annual update on the mall’s performance to the city, which owns the land under the structure and paid more than half the cost of building the mall.

The building itself is owned by a partnership of 20 mostly local companies, including Simon. The ownership group holds a mortgage note that matures in 2013, with a balance due of $66 million.

In its report, Simon blamed “weak economic conditions” and low consumer confidence for Circle Centre’s drop in per-square-foot sales.

One reason Circle Centre was hit so hard is that about 50 percent of its shoppers are visitors to the city, and business and leisure travel is suffering, Simon said. The company said the expansion of the Indiana Convention Center, under construction now, should lead to an improvement in mall sales.

The figures do not break out the performance of anchor stores, so it wasn’t clear whether Nordstrom’s new store at The Fashion Mall at Keystone, which opened in September 2008, has drawn significant amount of traffic away from the downtown store.

Having a second Indianapolis Nordstrom was a big enough concern for the mall developers back in the 1990s that they extracted an unusual concession from the company: that it would wait at least five years before opening another Indianapolis-area store.•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Comeback...?
    With the new hotels and convention expansion I don't think they will have to anything to keep these stores. Travelers all go to Circle Center and each one of those is likely to buy something. This slump may just be due to a decline in tourists.
  • so dumb
    i agree completely with Jethro. What a dumb comments by Huber. Stop speculating and let Simon make their deal. All of your comments are only undermining their efforts to do so. The whole article is just stupid. Nice work IBJ, way to get in the way of one of the most important companies to the city of Indianapolis. Clearly the IBJ is short on news so that have to created stupid banter like this that only serves to create speculation among tenants at the mall.
  • Lela,

    Add to Chris's comments that in bad weather I would much rather shop Circle Centre. Park out of snow, out of rain, out of cold. The walk from parking garage to mall much shorter than most walks at Castleton or Gwood during busy times. Much easier in and out of downtown than either mall during peak hours.
  • More to the story
    No one even mentions the huge note on the CIB books that has a balloon payment that they have no hope of paying off.
  • Your Not The Target Customer
    Lela, you are not a target customer of Circle Centre, so it makes not a hill of beans difference whether you would or wouldn't shop there. From the beginning, Circle Centre has focused on attracting downtown workers, tourists and convention-goers, area residents already downtown for some other reason, and also local residents who live within a closer drive to Circle Centre than they do to another nice mall (e.g. people who live near or in downtown or people on the west side of the city who don't want to shop at a scary rundown mall like Lafayette Square). Finally, the parking is very cheap and the minor walking distance to get into the mall is not an issue for most individuals. If you can't walk half a block or so, then you probably should be in a hospice waiting to die, not out shopping.
  • Taxpayer pigeons
    Sure, let the taxpayers further subsidize millionaires / billionaires. Folks, this is how a Ponzi scheme works; the taxpayers are the pigeons, with no recourse, as both parties consist of "public servants" who promise that prosperity is just around the corner for the average taxpayer, if only they would just "invest" a few more dollars in the scheme.

    Meanwhile, those running the scheme are laughing all the way to the bank. It is always much easier to get rich and stay rich when others assume the "real" risks.
  • I wouldn't go downtown to shop-ever!
    Why go downtown, pay to park and have a distance to walk, when you can almost drive up to the doors of the stores at the malls?
  • HUBERDUMB!!
    Are of the people working for the Mayor as STUPID as Huber? Shut your mouth and let the Simons negotiate the deal. Stop negotiating it in the press and bragging about how well the mall is doing. If I were the tenants I be licking my chops. Huber is stupid!

    Get a clue as to why SPG does not talk about lease negotiations with these tenants.

    Quoted from the article below...

    Meanwhile, city officials are preparing to step in and do whatever it takes to ensure the mall anchors remain, said Michael Huber, deputy mayor for economic development.

    Keeping Carson Pirie Scott and Nordstrom and a healthy, functioning mall is of critical importance,â?? Huber said. â??Weâ??re fortunate with the management of Simon Property Group the mall is doing as well as it is at a time when many downtown malls are not.


    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. liek the rest of America

    2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

    3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

    4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

    5. whoa!

    ADVERTISEMENT