IBJNews

Citizens Energy agrees to document utility savings

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A not-for-profit public trust that wants to buy Indianapolis' water and sewer utilities has agreed to document all of the savings it says the $1.9 billion deal would create.

Citizens Energy Group has agreed to document its claims that the proposed deal would reduce future rate increases and save $60 million a year. It agreed to do so under a settlement agreement announced Tuesday with three customer and consumer advocate groups.

If regulators approve the purchase, Citizens would submit public reports twice a year for four years.

But a key advocacy group, Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, did not agree to the settlement and is still weighing its options. Its attorneys say requiring the new owner to document savings isn't enough.

Mayor Greg Ballard and Citizens announced plans for the transfer in March 2010. If the water and sewer transaction gets final approval, it could free up $435 million for city infrastructure and transfer $1.5 billion in utility debt to Citizens.

City leaders said the deal would curb projected rate increases and remove politics from utilities management by transferring authority to Citizens, a not-for-profit with a board whose appointments aren’t political.

But the deal has drawn critics, particularly those who question Citizens’ ability to generate the $60 million in annual savings the company has pledged it can produce to pay off the debt for the purchase.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • IURC Should Reject This Whole Deal
    What's the big deal about them documenting that they will have no cost savings after they have already merged?

    In fact, it doesn't take a accountant to see that after they pay the break up fee to Veolia and lawyer fees, it will actually cost more than changing nothing.

    To add insult to injury, they want to divert $435 million of water company proceeds into slush fund for other things instead of reinvesting water company proceeds to lower the projected 100%+ incease in water/sewer bills.

    This is a silly boondoggle that the IURC should immediately reject and have them bid out management of this city asset.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. John, unfortunately CTRWD wants to put the tank(s) right next to a nature preserve and at the southern entrance to Carmel off of Keystone. Not exactly the kind of message you want to send to residents and visitors (come see our tanks as you enter our city and we build stuff in nature preserves...

  2. 85 feet for an ambitious project? I could shoot ej*culate farther than that.

  3. I tried, can't take it anymore. Untill Katz is replaced I can't listen anymore.

  4. Perhaps, but they've had a very active program to reduce rainwater/sump pump inflows for a number of years. But you are correct that controlling these peak flows will require spending more money - surge tanks, lines or removing storm water inflow at the source.

  5. All sewage goes to the Carmel treatment plant on the White River at 96th St. Rainfall should not affect sewage flows, but somehow it does - and the increased rate is more than the plant can handle a few times each year. One big source is typically homeowners who have their sump pumps connect into the sanitary sewer line rather than to the storm sewer line or yard. So we (Carmel and Clay Twp) need someway to hold the excess flow for a few days until the plant can process this material. Carmel wants the surge tank located at the treatment plant but than means an expensive underground line has to be installed through residential areas while CTRWD wants the surge tank located further 'upstream' from the treatment plant which costs less. Either solution works from an environmental control perspective. The less expensive solution means some people would likely have an unsightly tank near them. Carmel wants the more expensive solution - surprise!

ADVERTISEMENT