IBJNews

Citizens gets state OK for steep wastewater rate hike

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

State regulators on Wednesday approved a rate hike that will increase monthly wastewater bills by about 26 percent, or close to $14 on average, for Citizens Energy Group customers.

In all, Citizens received approval to generate about $50.6 million in new annual revenue.

The rate increases will come in two phases.

Effective immediately, Citizens will increase its wastewater revenue by 21.08 percent, or $38.25 million. Revenue will increase another 5.61 percent in October.

Rates will increase by different amounts based on the types of customers. Residential, commercial or industrial all pay different rates.

The first phase will increase rates “less than $10” per month for average residential customers starting in May, Citizens spokeswoman Sarah Holsapple said. Then bills will increase “less than $4” on average in October for residential customers, she said.

“We are concerned about the impact of rate increases and have programs in place to help those in need,” Citizens said in a prepared statement issued after the ruling by the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission.

Citizens sought the rate increase in response to a 2006 order the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued to the city of Indianapolis, who owned the wastewater utility at the time.

“Underinvestment over the past 100 years has resulted in an antiquated sewer system that is discharging four billion gallons of raw sewage per year into waterways,” Citizens said. “The wastewater rate increase will allow Citizens to continue our program to virtually eliminate sewer overflows by the year 2025.  It will also allow us to continue eliminating failing septic tanks that are endangering human health and the environment across Marion County.”

In a separate statement, the Indiana Office Utility Consumer Counselor said it understood the need for rate increases. The utility’s plans to address sewage overflows and federal mandates seemed to be a “reasonable approach.”

“We realize rate increases are never popular,” the office said. “However, today’s order will allow the sewer utility to complete a number of major infrastructure projects that are vital to public health.”

Part of the IURC’s order on Wednesday disallowed another $1.1 million Citizens sought in reimbursements.

Regulators denied the piece of funding because it related to executive compensation, which has been an ongoing concern.

The IURC issued a similar admonishment to Citizens in March when commissioners approved a 9-percent rate hike for its water utility.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Yes, Ollie...
    ...I believe they do think that you're stupid. It was brilliant, really, from a purely political perspective. Transfer the utility to a "charitable public trust", whatever that is, and get free cash in exchange to do a bunch of street resurfacings. Then Citizens can raise rates, and the public angst will be directed at them, but who cares, because the IURC will approve whatever rate increases they need to pay back the $400M they gave the Ballard administration as well as pay for the federally pushed sewer improvements, and make sure Carey Lykins and other execs maintain their 7-figure annual compensation packages. Citizens needn't care about public backlash because they are unelected and unaccountable to the public. They'll get their money. The Ballard administration got their money. (It's reminiscent of the Fed's playbook where they just print money to buy mortgages so that banks can put their more money into more profitable investment schemes than boring old mortgages.) And technically, no tax increase. Brilliant!
  • WOW
    This increase is huge $14 per month on our poor citizens. Just pay it WOW
  • Storm sewers as well
    They will have more problems with the storm sewers soon as well. people like me do not know what to do with all the gravel left behind from the repaired potholes, and the city has not swept the streets in 11 years, so where do you think the gravel around my house gets swept? yep !!!
  • "Tax Increase"
    The problem with sewer overflow has been a problem for a long time. Goldsmith and Peterson both developed huge capital improvement projects to help the problem. Now the City sells the utility to CEG to let them deal with the problem. The City gets big revenue in the sale but passes the infrastructure problems on to CEG. The City spends big money with the Pacers, Colts and maybe the Indy Eleven but cannot get more police or fix the sewer problems. Now CEG gets to raise their rates. Is this not just a 'tax increase" in sheep clothing? Do they think we are all stupid???
  • Indy is a Banana Republic
    Come on Ballard where is the savings???? Legalized extortion! PILOT -PAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES.... What kind of raises do these jerks think the average citizen gets? Disclose the Colts and Pacer Suites and other Meals and Entertainment the OVERPAID EXECUTIVES stiff the ratepayors on. INDY=Banana Republic

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

ADVERTISEMENT