IBJNews

Citizens plans new unit to sell liquefied natural gas

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Citizens Energy Group plans to establish a subsidiary that will market and sell liquefied natural gas as a vehicle fuel, the utility said in a filing released this week.

LNG Indy plans to sell the fuel as an alternative to diesel in heavy-duty vehicles or for off-road applications such as drilling rigs, marine vessels or rail vehicles. It also would market the refrigerated liquid as replacement for propane in agricultural drying and in asphalt production.

The multistate transportation subsidiary would purchase the fuel from Citizens Gas’ LNG plant at 4536 W. 86th Street in Indianapolis.

That facility will be expanded, although Citizens did not disclose the amount of the investment planned in the Dec. 3 filing with state regulators.

Citizens officials were not available to discuss the project Thursday morning.

The LNG plant and a sister facility in Beech Grove buy natural gas when it is cheaper during warm-weather months. The gas is chilled to a liquid state to maximize storage capacity—the equivalent of 1 billion cubic feet of gas in each LNG plant.

The gas is tapped as needed during peak winter demand for Citizens' 266,000 natural gas customers in Marion County.

However, in another filing this month with the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission, Citizens said it plans to decommission the LNG-South facility, at 3565 Big Four Road. It cited high capital costs for the closure among other reasons.

Citizens said possible market conditions down the line could warrant using the South facility for producing, marketing and selling LNG.

In June, Citizens said it planned to sell LNG for use in cross-country trucks as a lower cost alternative to diesel fuel.

 “It is estimated that converting from diesel or propane to LNG currently can save 20 percent or more on a company’s total fuel bill,” Citizens said in its IURC filing this month.

Citizens already sells compressed natural gas to truck fleets in the city.  LNG can be even more cost effective than CNG, but vehicles that burn it must have refrigeration equipment on board. Thus, LNG is often most cost effective for trucks that drive long distances.

Citizens told the commission that sales of LNG to the new subsidiary will not adversely affect reliability of its gas-distribution system.

Earlier this year, Citizens said it was negotiating with at least three developers or fleet operations interesting in contracting LNG from the utility.

One commercial developer that identified Indianapolis as a future site for an LNG fueling facility is California-based Clean Energy Fuels. It said the pumps are planned for the Flying J at 1720 W. Thompson Road.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT