IBJNews

Citizens plans new unit to sell liquefied natural gas

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Citizens Energy Group plans to establish a subsidiary that will market and sell liquefied natural gas as a vehicle fuel, the utility said in a filing released this week.

LNG Indy plans to sell the fuel as an alternative to diesel in heavy-duty vehicles or for off-road applications such as drilling rigs, marine vessels or rail vehicles. It also would market the refrigerated liquid as replacement for propane in agricultural drying and in asphalt production.

The multistate transportation subsidiary would purchase the fuel from Citizens Gas’ LNG plant at 4536 W. 86th Street in Indianapolis.

That facility will be expanded, although Citizens did not disclose the amount of the investment planned in the Dec. 3 filing with state regulators.

Citizens officials were not available to discuss the project Thursday morning.

The LNG plant and a sister facility in Beech Grove buy natural gas when it is cheaper during warm-weather months. The gas is chilled to a liquid state to maximize storage capacity—the equivalent of 1 billion cubic feet of gas in each LNG plant.

The gas is tapped as needed during peak winter demand for Citizens' 266,000 natural gas customers in Marion County.

However, in another filing this month with the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission, Citizens said it plans to decommission the LNG-South facility, at 3565 Big Four Road. It cited high capital costs for the closure among other reasons.

Citizens said possible market conditions down the line could warrant using the South facility for producing, marketing and selling LNG.

In June, Citizens said it planned to sell LNG for use in cross-country trucks as a lower cost alternative to diesel fuel.

 “It is estimated that converting from diesel or propane to LNG currently can save 20 percent or more on a company’s total fuel bill,” Citizens said in its IURC filing this month.

Citizens already sells compressed natural gas to truck fleets in the city.  LNG can be even more cost effective than CNG, but vehicles that burn it must have refrigeration equipment on board. Thus, LNG is often most cost effective for trucks that drive long distances.

Citizens told the commission that sales of LNG to the new subsidiary will not adversely affect reliability of its gas-distribution system.

Earlier this year, Citizens said it was negotiating with at least three developers or fleet operations interesting in contracting LNG from the utility.

One commercial developer that identified Indianapolis as a future site for an LNG fueling facility is California-based Clean Energy Fuels. It said the pumps are planned for the Flying J at 1720 W. Thompson Road.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. these guys only skill was to steal from other's hard earned savings.

  2. I voted for him last time and it WAS the LAST time. He needed to to quit running around the world on useless trips, and giving our $$ away to sports teams. I'll vote for anyone but Ballard next time. BTW...we gave $40M to the Pacers and cannot even watch the games on TV.

  3. For the people concerned about traffic, you should know that mixed-use projects (like the one being proposed), actually allows for and encourages more people to walk and bike, thereby mitigating additional automobile traffic. If we continue to design and build suburban-type projects in the City (i.e. automobile-oriented projects), we are not offering anything different from what the suburbs offer, which means we will continue to lose jobs/people to the suburbs. The reason Broad Ripple is somewhat successful today is that people want to live in a place that offers the convenience of being able to walk/bike to restaurants, retail, nightlife, the Monon, etc. Why would you not want to support a project that is complimentary to what already makes the area desirable? The real argument with this project should be its lack-luster design and layout, not the density.

  4. It is unfortunate that there is a perception that celebrities validate an event. The Indy 500 stands on its own, especially for those coming in from out of town. It was always so disturbing to read the gushing descriptions of Ashley Judd threaded throughout the local coverage. Very happy that era is at an end.

  5. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

ADVERTISEMENT