IBJNews

Citizens plans new unit to sell liquefied natural gas

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Citizens Energy Group plans to establish a subsidiary that will market and sell liquefied natural gas as a vehicle fuel, the utility said in a filing released this week.

LNG Indy plans to sell the fuel as an alternative to diesel in heavy-duty vehicles or for off-road applications such as drilling rigs, marine vessels or rail vehicles. It also would market the refrigerated liquid as replacement for propane in agricultural drying and in asphalt production.

The multistate transportation subsidiary would purchase the fuel from Citizens Gas’ LNG plant at 4536 W. 86th Street in Indianapolis.

That facility will be expanded, although Citizens did not disclose the amount of the investment planned in the Dec. 3 filing with state regulators.

Citizens officials were not available to discuss the project Thursday morning.

The LNG plant and a sister facility in Beech Grove buy natural gas when it is cheaper during warm-weather months. The gas is chilled to a liquid state to maximize storage capacity—the equivalent of 1 billion cubic feet of gas in each LNG plant.

The gas is tapped as needed during peak winter demand for Citizens' 266,000 natural gas customers in Marion County.

However, in another filing this month with the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission, Citizens said it plans to decommission the LNG-South facility, at 3565 Big Four Road. It cited high capital costs for the closure among other reasons.

Citizens said possible market conditions down the line could warrant using the South facility for producing, marketing and selling LNG.

In June, Citizens said it planned to sell LNG for use in cross-country trucks as a lower cost alternative to diesel fuel.

 “It is estimated that converting from diesel or propane to LNG currently can save 20 percent or more on a company’s total fuel bill,” Citizens said in its IURC filing this month.

Citizens already sells compressed natural gas to truck fleets in the city.  LNG can be even more cost effective than CNG, but vehicles that burn it must have refrigeration equipment on board. Thus, LNG is often most cost effective for trucks that drive long distances.

Citizens told the commission that sales of LNG to the new subsidiary will not adversely affect reliability of its gas-distribution system.

Earlier this year, Citizens said it was negotiating with at least three developers or fleet operations interesting in contracting LNG from the utility.

One commercial developer that identified Indianapolis as a future site for an LNG fueling facility is California-based Clean Energy Fuels. It said the pumps are planned for the Flying J at 1720 W. Thompson Road.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • LNG/diesel conversions
    We currently build a propane injection system for diesel engines, and are interested in doing the same with LNG. We feel it is the fuel of the future, with lower costs for the fuel itself. We would like someone with Citizens to contact us concerning this technology we currently possess. Thanks, JRS of Smart Technologies, LLC Franklin, IN

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT