IBJNews

Citizens steam users could see hike as high as 23 percent

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A vast majority of the 185 steam-service customers of Citizens Energy Group would pay at least 12.9 percent to 23 percent more under a rate-increase proposal.

The utility said Thursday it had filed a petition for the hike with the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission, and since has provided more details to IBJ. If the increase is approved by the IURC, it likely would go into effect by spring 2014. The impact on individual customers would vary.

Mostly downtown-based commercial and industrial businesses, the steam users fall into four rate classes that each would be affected differently, said Sarah Holsapple, Citizens’ media relations coordinator.  And within each rate category, other criteria could affect the size of the increase.

The largest rate class includes 136 customers, whose rates would rise 12.9 percent to 23 percent under the proposed hikes, Holsapple said. The second-largest rate class has 46 customers, whose rates would go up 12 percent to 19 percent.

That leaves three customers in the remaining two classes. Their rates would either stay the same or increase marginally.

Holsapple declined to give examples of customers in particular classes.

Citizens requires more revenue from its steam users to help foot the bill for the conversion of downtown’s Perry K Steam Plant from coal to natural gas, the utility said.

Citizens first announced the conversion project in late 2011. The plant at Kentucky Avenue near Victory Field supplies steam to major users such as IUPUI and Lucas Oil Stadium. In warmer weather, the steam turns water chillers that cool the buildings.

The rate increase also is necessary to help pay off an existing line of credit and finance a system expansion, according to Citizens.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Pay
    As Citizen's (Just like you), I'm offended that three Citizen's employees make $1 Million per year. Higher than most University Presidents.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

ADVERTISEMENT