IBJNews

City calls off Haverstick, Redcats tax incentives

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Two Indianapolis companies that received tax-abatement agreements from the city in 2007 have had the incentives canceled for failing to meet investment and employment goals.

The city’s Metropolitan Development Commission on Wednesday voted to rescind the abatements given to Haverstick Consulting Inc. and Redcats USA.

Haverstick, a defense-consulting firm whose financial backers include former Conseco executives Stephen Hilbert and Rollin Dick, was acquired by Kratos Defense & Security Solutions Inc. of San Diego in 2007 for $90 million.

Haverstick agreed that over six years it would invest $1.1 million in operations and hire 40 employees at an average hourly wage of $34.50, in addition to retaining 68 employees at an average hourly wage of $37.65.

As of the end of 2010, Haverstick had made $680,000 in investments and had total employment of 36, prompting the city to start the process to cancel the incentives.

The company received $2,558 in tax savings of an estimated potential of $64,516, the city said.

Haverstick referred questions to its San Diego headquarters, which did not return calls from IBJ.

Meanwhile, New York-based Redcats USA agreed to spend $21 million over eight years to upgrade its clothing-catalog operation on Southeastern Avenue. The company also said it would add 42 jobs to the nearly 900 workers employed at the site and a warehouse in Plainfield.

The new jobs were expected to pay an average hourly wage of $31.40 and the 894 retained jobs were supposed to pay an average hourly wage of $26.90.

As of the end of last year, Redcats had made $6.2 million in investments and had total employment of 692, according to city officials.

The company received $52,439 in tax savings of an estimated potential of $1.8 million, the city said.

Calls to Redcats Southeastern Avenue facility were not returned.

The city said both companies agreed to terminate their abatements.

The Indiana Economic Development Corp. offered both companies training grants. Redcats received $142,560 and is no longer eligible to receive more state funding, an IEDC spokeswoman said. Haverstick received $8,800 and also is no longer eligible for additional state funds.
 


ADVERTISEMENT
  • It's called common sense
    Companies don't hire in down economies, so stop playing the silly "Occupy" card with the 1 percent. Perhaps if this administration wasn't adding new regulations every day, our capital-intensive companies could sell more and then, consequently, hire more.
  • Lost jobs
    So am I reading this right? Both companies promised to add jobs to the existing jobs that were here, and instead they reduced the number of jobs in total. So much for the job-creating one percent.
  • Wage
    I worked at Redcats for 31 years. My top salary was $16.90 at retirement. Had I been making $31.40 an hour, I would still be working, no matter how much pain I was in! Unless, they are including all of the benefits one gets as an employee.
  • Really?
    Meanwhile, the same city gives Rolls-Royce $22M that has basically no commitments for jobs or investments.
  • Back taxes
    Do can the city get back taxes from these deals? I'm pretty sure they'd come after little-ol-me if it were the case.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The lack of street-level retail in this part of the Block 400 development is a huge oversight and somewhat perplexing given the high quality of recent city-backed developments downtown. This portion of an otherwise stellar development is going to have an extremely negative impact on the aesthetics, urban environment, walkability, and livability of the NW quad.

    I'm not sure why One America would oppose including retail. And I find it very hard to believe that the thousands of office workers literally footsteps away wouldn't be able to support new lunchtime destinations and other businesses along Illinois and Vermont. We've got to reconnect the disjointed segments of our blossoming downtown, not create yet another lifeless dead zone that no one wants to walk through. Sadly, that is exactly what this massive ugly single-use structure will accomplish.

    Why not follow the precedent set by the proposed garage in Broad Ripple and create an attractive mixed-use structure? Why does the city get it there but not downtown?

  2. Bear mind that DS is just not another lazy, rich kid. He attended Columbia grad school and was in investment banking for 4 or 5 years before joining his dad's company. An annual grant of stock options at market price would be the correct pay-for-performance program then no one could argue with it.

  3. This comes from an executive who gave his wife a Bentley as a wedding present. He is heir to billions of dollars. He should be working for a dollar a year and stock options only. Seems like a conflict of interest, time to bring in a non-relative as CEO. Haven't met him, but have heard his arrogance is legendary.

  4. If the property is improved, property taxes increase - more revenue. If AUL's employment grows, more income taxes - more revenue. If more people move and/or work downtown, it means more demand for goods and services, more employment, more taxes - more revenue, etc., etc. It's not just the city throwing money at big companies. There's much, much more. Yes, the project has private backing, but apparently not enough to make the deal work and therefore they don't have it covered. And while Marsh is a nice anchor, they are no credit tenant like a Kroger or somebody. And if the police department has a major shortfall, they need to reduce the force. This city has way too many policemen.

  5. It's hard to defend billionaires, but David Simon has created a tremendous amount of value for shareholders since joining the company. He is widely regarded as one of the best CEOs in America. The company is growing and making good strategic decisions. And Indy is fortunate to have SPG HQ'd here. Now, does that merit $120 million (about 15 mil over 8 years or so)? Maybe. But this family and David have truly built a business. Should Zuckerberg be worth $20 bil? Who knows. Hopefully David will be supportive of Hoosier charities like his family has.

ADVERTISEMENT