City can improve meters itself

October 23, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Letters To The Editor

In response to John Guy’s [Oct. 18] column, “Do meter-contract critics have a plan?” let me respond, yes we do—and it does not involve sellng off a city asset (along with the plan to sell the water department) much less to a company with a dubious reputation on a 50-year (now apparently 20-) year lease, limiting the use of our city streets, etc.

Our plan is simple: Instead of selling the parking-meter system to a business, we would run it like a business:

• Raise the parking rates to market levels from their 1970 levels. This is not brain surgery.

• Charge for parking until 9 p.m. weekdays and on Saturdays like every other city in America.

• If needed, use revenue bonds from the meter fees to put in electronic meters, if such meters are cost-effective.

This “plan” compares to leasing or selling the meters to a for-profit company (one which apparently was involved with the privitization of the state welfare system fiasco).

Their plan limits development of our city streets and would make things like the  Cultural Trail impossible.

Their plan is a “take the money and run” scheme that dodges a much more simple fix.

You do not have to sell off the parking meters to bring the rates and service hours up to par with other Midwest cities.

Further, selling the parking meters has been tried in only one city (Chicago) and it is no doubt part of the reason Mayor Daley is not seeking re-election. It did not work there—rates tripled and service declined.

Putting the use of city streets in the hands of a private company is bad public policy.

Enough is enough.


Bill Malcolm


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ