IBJNews

City launches extensive rezoning initiative

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The city of Indianapolis has launched an initiative expected to result in the first major overhaul of its zoning and development regulations since 1969.

The nearly $2 million effort, named Indy Rezone, is being steered by city planners, private developers, elected officials, architects, community activists and others. Their task is to collect public input and draft a new set of regulations by March 2014.

The new regulations could alter parking space requirements and other details developers routinely contend with. They also could include incentives for green development and make it easier to include such features as solar panels and wind turbines.

Among the goals of the effort is to remove obstacles to development while at the same time encouraging projects that are more environmentally friendly and better suited to pedestrians and multiple modes of transportation.

John Neal, a senior planner for the Department of Metropolitan Development’s division of planning, said the changes could streamline the development process by, among other things, reducing the number of zoning classifications and the need for costly zoning variances.

The city now has 17 residential zoning classifications and 10 commercial ones, Neal said. And many of its regulations were written with suburban, car-dependent development in mind.

For example, current regulations in many of the city’s commercial districts require buildings to be constructed 80 to 100 feet from the right-of-way. To bring buildings up to the sidewalk, a characteristic often found in pedestrian-friendly areas, a developer must apply to the city for a variance of development standards. “In some parts of the city it might make sense to have smaller setbacks,” Neal said.

On the residential front, in many single-family neighborhoods around the city at least 65 percent of a residential lot must be maintained as open space. To build on more of the lot requires a zoning variance. It’s possible that such regulations are an impediment to reinvestment in those neighborhoods, Neal said.

The Indy Rezone Steering Committee is co-chaired by local commercial real estate broker Abbe Hohmann and Michael Bricker, founder of People for Urban Progress, a local not-for-profit that promotes and advances public transit, environmental awareness and urban design.

Its six task forces are organized around residential development, non-residential development, signs, wellfields, parking and streets, and process and administration.

Wes Podell, a Duke Realty executive who is a member of the non-residential task force, said Indy Rezone could result in a more competitive city. “A forward-looking, flexible code and simplified process will encourage developers and companies to make investments here,” Podell said in a written statement.  

Work on the Indy Rezone initiative has been going on behind the scenes for a couple of years. The city applied to the federal government’s Department of Housing & Urban Development in August 2010 for a Community Challenge Planning Grant to fund the effort. Indianapolis was among 43 cities chosen from among 583 applicants and began planning for the process in earnest in March 2011.

The $1.2 million grant is being matched by the cost of devoting several city employees to the effort over the next two years.

Once the new regulations are drafted, they’ll require approval by the Metropolitan Development Commission and the City-County Council and a signature from Mayor Ballard.

More information is available at indyrezone.org.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Nashville
    I am really hoping it will have some of the same qualities as Nashville, Tennessee's. They have done an excellent job at redefining their downtown zones and giving developers incentives to make livable and sustainable decisions.
  • Conspiracy Theories Are Old
    Joyce, Indianapolis would never become anything like NYC, even with a 50 billion dollars, all the zoning regulations in the world, and 50 years. New York City is as dense as it is because so many people and businesses want to locate there. Indianapolis will simply never have that demand. So, put the tired conspiracy theory to bed that somehow someone wants to make Indianapolis into NYC. Indianapolis should wish it was even 1/1000 as exciting, interesting, or cultured as NYC. Now, what you should focus on is how to make Indianapolis the best is can be for a largish city in a mid-sized Midwestern metro area. Redeveloping abandoned or underutilized areas is one way to improve the quality of life for everyone and increase economic activity in the city.
  • Joyce
    Small businesses should only dream of the marketability of a product in a denser urban setting. How do you justify a quality buisness location? IF it is simply cheap operating costs and expansive land, move to Kansas. If you need people and visability to drive sales, an increase in population density will certainly do that.
  • No Wind / Solar
    "They also could include incentives for green development and make it easier to include such features as solar panels and wind turbines." Please NO. Clear a block in the middle of the city for a MSR power plant instead. http://energyfromthorium.com
  • Zoning Review
    Well, I hope the purpose is to make redevelopment easier. I have my doubts, though. The only people we know will be vocal are the urbanites, who want to turn Indianapolis into NYC. If you are a small business owner in the city, please make them hear your ideas.
    • Small business
      Tyoical of the big business give money to the rich mentality. The variance and city planners blead the small businesses and lay down the red carpet for large developers. The city and the variance process is a long and tedious proposiition. It should be less expensive and more small business friendly. This attempt to clear up the city intrusion into this process is long overdue.
    • Bout Time
      Yes, it is about time! We have been behind the zoning times for most of the last 25-30 years, and this could be the effort to change it all...and especially allow for better and simpler to understand development, and development standards, without the almighty variance prohibiting expanded economic development!

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Socialized medicine works great for white people in Scandanavia. It works well in Costa Rica for a population that is partly white and partly mestizo. I don't really see Obamacare as something aimed against whites. I think that is a Republican canard designed to elicit support from white people for republican candidates who don't care about them any more than democrats care about the non-whites they pander to with their phony maneuvers. But what is different between Costa Rica nd the Scandanavian nations on one hand and the US on the other? SIZE. Maybe the US is just too damn big. Maybe it just needs to be divided into smaller self governing pieces like when the old Holy Roman Empire was dismantled. Maybe we are always trying the same set of solutions for different kinds of people as if we were all the same. Oh-- I know-- that is liberal dogma, that we are all the same. Which is the most idiotic American notion going right back to the propaganda of 1776. All men are different and their differences are myriad and that which is different is not equal. The state which pretends men are all the same is going to force men to be the same. That is what America does here, that is what we do in our stupid overseas wars, that is how we destroy true diversity and true difference, and we are all as different groups of folks, feeling the pains of how capitalism is grinding us down into equally insignificant proletarian microconsumers with no other identity whether we like it or not. And the Marxists had this much right about the War of Independence: it was fundamentally a war of capitalist against feudal systems. America has been about big money since day one and whatever gets in the way is crushed. Health care is just another market and Obamacare, to the extent that it Rationalizes and makes more uniform a market which should actually be really different in nature and delivery from place to place-- well that will serve the interests of the biggest capitalist stakeholders in health care which is not Walmart for Gosh Sakes it is the INSURANCE INDUSTRY. CUI BONO Obamacare? The insurance industry. So republicans drop the delusion pro capitalist scales from your eyes this has almost nothing to do with race or "socialism" it has to do mostly with what the INSURANCE INDUSTRY wants to have happen in order to make their lives and profits easier.

    2. Read the article - the reason they can't justify staying is they have too many medicare/medicaid patients and the re-imbursements for transporting these patient is so low.

    3. I would not vote for Bayh if he did run. I also wouldn't vote for Pence. My guess is that Bayh does not have the stomach to oppose persons on the far left or far right. Also, outside of capitalizing on his time as U. S. Senator (and his wife's time as a board member to several companies) I don't know if he is willing to fight for anything. If people who claim to be in the middle walk away from fights with the right and left wing, what are we left with? Extremes. It's probably best for Bayh if he does not have the stomach for the fight but the result is no middle ground.

    4. JK - I meant that the results don't ring true. I also questioned the 10-year-old study because so much in the "health care system" has changed since the study was made. Moreover, it was hard to get to any overall conclusion or observation with the article. But....don't be defensive given my comments; I still think you do the best job of any journalist in the area shedding light and insight on important health care issues.

    5. Probably a good idea he doesn't run. I for one do not want someone who lives in VIRGINIA to be the governor. He gave it some thought, but he likes Virginia too much. What a name I cannot say on this site! The way these people think and operate amuses me.

    ADVERTISEMENT