IBJNews

Closed meeting angers wounded store clerk's family

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The family of a convenience store clerk critically injured in an October shooting harshly criticized an Indiana agency's decision to hold a closed-door meeting Wednesday with trade groups on efforts to boost safety at the 24-hour facilities.

Relatives of Marcella Birnell, a 38-year-old Village Pantry clerk who was shot in the head last fall during a robbery, said the first meeting on the topic should be open to the public.

"The family ... is outraged that the group has refused to listen to the voices of concerned citizens who wish to find reasonable solutions to safety issues for convenience store employees," Theresia Whitfield, a spokeswoman for the family, said in an email.

Convenience store trade groups, police and state officials met Wednesday at the Indiana Government Center South in Indianapolis to discuss the goals and a timeline for an effort to improve safety at the stores. Store upgrades to be discussed include more security cameras, bulletproof glass, alarms and better lighting.

State Rep. Ed DeLaney, an Indianapolis Democrat who pushed for the meeting, said the issue is an important one that affects store employees and consumers and should be vetted through an open process.

"We need to have a public airing of this issue, which really is growing," DeLaney told The Indianapolis Star.

"The exclusion of both the public and media from this dialogue will erode the public's confidence that their best interests are being considered through this process," he wrote in a letter to Department of Labor Commissioner Lori Torres.

DeLaney said Torres called him Tuesday evening after he sent the letter to explain why the meeting was closed. He said she told him some of the companies were worried that what they said during a meeting might hurt them if lawsuits are filed.

Department of Labor spokesman Bob Dittmer said members of the Convenience Store Working Group wanted their first meeting to be private so they could get organized "without the presence of others distracting them."

He said agency officials think the group is not subject to the state's Open Door Law, which requires most government meetings to be open. However, Dittmer said the group could have subsequent meetings that will be open to the public.

"That's for them to decide," he said. "One could certainly anticipate that that's the likelihood."

Dittmer declined comment on DeLaney's statement.

The Convenience Store Working Group said in a news release that its mission is to "facilitate the adoption and use of industry best practices for promoting worker safety and workplace violence prevention in 24-hour convenience stores."

DeLaney said he hopes the committee eventually will invite the public to be part of the discussion.

"We're trying to protect the public as well as employees," he said. "The public ought to be concerned about this."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT