IBJNews

Closing arguments under way in White trial

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Closing arguments are under way at the voter fraud trial of Indiana's elections chief in a case that could oust him from office.

Special prosecutor Dan Sigler Jr. argued Friday morning in Hamilton County Superior Court that Secretary of State Charlie White knowingly committed voter fraud for political power.

White's attorney, Carl Brizzi, said in his closing arguments that prosecutors' case "is based entirely on assumption, innuendo and leaps." The jury is expected to begin deliberating after Friday's closing arguments.

White is charged with seven felony counts, including fraud, perjury and theft. If White is convicted of a single count, he faces removal from office and possible prison time.

Prosecutors claim White used his ex-wife's address on his voter registration form in the May 2010 Republican primary when he actually had a condo elsewhere with his fiancée. Brizzi rested Thursday without presenting a case againsthe charges.

The strategy employed by White's lawyer, Carl Brizzi, is risky, said a professor at the Indiana University School of Law at Indianapolis.

Fran Watson, who teaches a criminal defense clinic, said the strategy can work if jurors are unconvinced by the prosecutors' case, but she isn't sure it was wise in White's case.

"It is a sound strategy in that it's always the prosecutor's burden to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt," Watson said.

But, she added, "With seven counts, it's a little hard to believe it's going to work," as the more counts there are against a defendant, the greater the odds that jurors will find him guilty of at least one.

White would be immediately removed from office if jurors find him guilty, said Fred Biesecker, an attorney at Ice Miller who handles government and election law cases.

State law says that any "public officer ...shall be removed from office...when ...a jury publicly announces a verdict against the person for a felony."

The same law says the official can return to office if the conviction is reversed on appeal, he said.

Prosecutors claim White used his ex-wife's address on his voter registration form in the May 2010 Republican primary when he actually had a condo elsewhere with his fiancee. They also say he continued to collect a salary for a council position after he had moved from the district he was supposed to represent.

White, 42, has said the charges he faces ignore a complicated personal life in which he was trying to raise his 10-year-old son, plan his second marriage in May 2010 and campaign for the statewide office he won that November. He said he stayed at his ex-wife's house when he wasn't on the road campaigning and did not live in the condo until after his remarriage.

White has resisted calls to resign from Democrats and Republicans, including Gov. Mitch Daniels.

In December, a Marion County judge ruled that White should be ousted, but that decision has been appealed. The same judge also said White should be replaced by Vop Osili, the Democrat he defeated in the November 2010 election by about 300,000 votes; state law calls for Daniels to appoint a successor.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The deductible is entirely paid by the POWER account. No one ever has to contribute more than $25/month into the POWER account and it is often less. The only cost not paid out of the POWER account is the ER copay ($8-25) for non-emergent use of the ER. And under HIP 2.0, if a member calls the toll-free, 24 hour nurse line, and the nurse tells them to go to the ER, the copay is waived. It's also waived if the member is admitted to the hospital. Honestly, although it is certainly not "free" - I think Indiana has created a decent plan for the currently uninsured. Also consider that if a member obtains preventive care, she can lower her monthly contribution for the next year. Non-profits may pay up to 75% of the contribution on behalf of the member, and the member's employer may pay up to 50% of the contribution.

  2. I wonder if the governor could multi-task and talk to CMS about helping Indiana get our state based exchange going so Hoosiers don't lose subsidy if the court decision holds. One option I've seen is for states to contract with healthcare.gov. Or maybe Indiana isn't really interested in healthcare insurance coverage for Hoosiers.

  3. So, how much did either of YOU contribute? HGH Thank you Mr. Ozdemir for your investments in this city and your contribution to the arts.

  4. So heres brilliant planning for you...build a $30 M sports complex with tax dollars, yet send all the hotel tax revenue to Carmel and Fishers. Westfield will unlikely never see a payback but the hotel "centers" of Carmel and Fishers will get rich. Lousy strategy Andy Cook!

  5. AlanB, this is how it works...A corporate welfare queen makes a tiny contribution to the arts and gets tons of positive media from outlets like the IBJ. In turn, they are more easily to get their 10s of millions of dollars of corporate welfare (ironically from the same people who are against welfare for humans).

ADVERTISEMENT