IBJNews

Commission approves demolition for Indy East Motel

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Developers planning a reuse project for a vacant east-side motel that was once a crime magnet cleared a big hurdle Wednesday night.

The Indianapolis Historic Preservation Commission unanimously approved the demolition of the former Indy East Motel at 5585 E. Washington St.—with a few conditions.

Groups leading the redevelopment effort must get approval of the architectural renderings for the site’s new development and line up financing for the project before tearing down the motel, said Amandula Anderson, executive director of Irvington Development Organization, or IDO. Her not-for-profit group is working with investors with ties to Meyer-Najem Construction Co. on the project.

As IBJ reported last month, financing for the $8.7 million project will depend on IDO's ability to secure federal tax credits through the state. The group intends to apply for those before the Nov. 1 deadline and expects to know whether they'll get them by March. The development will include about 50 one- and two-bedroom apartments and 3,000 square feet of community space.

Anderson said her group will have neighborhood meetings about the project every two or three weeks through the end of the year to get feedback. That will help determine details, such as what goes in the community space, how much green space the project includes and whether it has features such as a green roof.

Chris Piazza, president of local development firm Reverie Estates, attended Wednesday's meeting with about 25 area residents to protest the demolition. Piazza had proposed a $3 million renovation of the hotel into an "artist colony," with live/work studios for artists and an art gallery.

In an e-mail sent to IBJ Thursday morning, he pointed to several reasons the 1959 structure should be saved, provided it could be creatively reused.

"It is on the National Road, it shows the evolution of architecture over time," Piazza said. "It is a mid-century modern building, no matter how ugly it looks right now. I saw the potential in not only reusing it, but creating a destination in the city unlike any other—with that I see the historic significance."

Piazza and area residents also raised concerns that IDO has not engaged the community enough in discussions about the development plans.

Anderson said her group felt they needed first to tackle certain steps, such as rezoning the site, before getting neighborhood input. But last night’s testimony signaled a need for more discussions with residents, she said.

“That was a clear message to us,” Anderson said. “We had not done a good job of communicating with the neighborhood.”

Some community members also showed up in support. Kyla Thompson, president of the 11-member Historic Irvington Community Council, which represents the neighborhood, said her group voted to officially back IDO's efforts in August. She sees remediation as a long-overdue salvo to a problem spot in the community.

"I get frustrated because I see a positive thing that’s happening in the neighborhood, and a number of people don’t want to move forward with positive change," Thompson said. "If you don’t move forward and change the neighborhood for the positive, your neighborhood dies."

The city revoked the Indy East Motel’s license in 2006 and shut down the motel in 2009, heeding complaints from residents and police. IDO has been working with investors on the proposal for about 10 months. The group got the deed for the property, which was tax-delinquent, in late July.

If the developers can secure the tax credits, they hope to present architectural renderings to IHPC in April, Anderson said. If those plans are approved, the site’s demolition would take place late next summer, and work on the new development would begin soon after.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Address
    Address should be 5855 E Washington.
  • demonition
    I would not take down the structure unless it is not safe. As for 1 and 2 bedrooms apartments being built there, there should an artist building. There are apartment just east of it why make more. It is on the historical highway why put another apartments complex next to it.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT