IBJNews

Commission OKs Ameriplex, Rexnord tax abatements

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Metropolitan Development Commission this afternoon approved two requests for property tax abatement, including one for a mammoth development known as World Connect at AmeriPlex.

South Bend-based Holladay Properties is planning to invest $120 million in the development at the business park near the Indianapolis International Airport.

World Connect would encompass 200 acres and contain about 3 million square feet of logistics, advanced manufacturing and office space. The developers estimate the project will create 1,700 jobs with an average annual salary of $45,000.

The nine buildings would be constructed to achieve Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design [LEED] certification and would include large distribution centers as well as medium bulk and flex space. 

The city entered into a contract with the developers and will receive a 1-percent equity share in the buildings.

The commission approved a 10-year tax abatement that would save Holladay $13.2 million in property taxes over the next decade.

In addition, the commission granted a five-year tax abatement to the Indianapolis plant of Rexnord Industries LLC that should save the company $79,653 in property taxes.

In exchange, Rexnord is promising to create 43 jobs and retain hundreds more. Milwaukee-based Rexnord’s plant, at 7601 Rockville Road in Indianapolis, manufactures industrial-roller and ball-bearing products for industrial uses.

The company is requesting the abatement to offset a $1.8 million investment in new equipment that will help it consolidate two manufacturing lines outside the state into the local facility.

The jobs created by the new production line are expected to pay an average hourly wage of $20.93, Rexnord said. In addition, the company said the new equipment will help to retain 270 jobs paying an average of $25.45 an hour. 

The abatements granted by the commission still need the consent of the City-County Council.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I'm a CPA who works with a wide range of companies (through my firm K.B.Parrish & Co.); however, we work with quite a few car dealerships, so I'm fairly interested in Fatwin (mentioned in the article). Does anyone have much information on that, or a link to such information? Thanks.

  2. Historically high long-term unemployment, unprecedented labor market slack and the loss of human capital should not be accepted as "the economy at work [and] what is supposed to happen" and is certainly not raising wages in Indiana. See Chicago Fed Reserve: goo.gl/IJ4JhQ Also, here's our research on Work Sharing and our support testimony at yesterday's hearing: goo.gl/NhC9W4

  3. I am always curious why teachers don't believe in accountability. It's the only profession in the world that things they are better than everyone else. It's really a shame.

  4. It's not often in Indiana that people from both major political parties and from both labor and business groups come together to endorse a proposal. I really think this is going to help create a more flexible labor force, which is what businesses claim to need, while also reducing outright layoffs, and mitigating the impact of salary/wage reductions, both of which have been highlighted as important issues affecting Hoosier workers. Like many other public policies, I'm sure that this one will, over time, be tweaked and changed as needed to meet Indiana's needs. But when you have such broad agreement, why not give this a try?

  5. I could not agree more with Ben's statement. Every time I look at my unemployment insurance rate, "irritated" hardly describes my sentiment. We are talking about a surplus of funds, and possibly refunding that, why, so we can say we did it and get a notch in our political belt? This is real money, to real companies, large and small. The impact is felt across the board; in the spending of the company, the hiring (or lack thereof due to higher insurance costs), as well as in the personal spending of the owners of a smaller company.

ADVERTISEMENT