Committee strips down, passes ag-gag bill

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A Senate committee watered down a bill Tuesday that was meant to stop secret videography and photography of farming operations.

Senate Bill 101 – previously known as the ag-gag bill – originally created a crime called “agricultural mischief.”

But, after facing harsh opposition, Sen. Travis Holdman, R-Markle, amended the bill to limit the crime to property damage and criminal trespassing.

“Basically what we’re doing is striking most of the portions or all of the portions that have to do with mischief that are in the bill,” Holdman said. “We get down to just the trespass issue.”

The amendment reduces the crime to trespassing and property damage as long as the property owner posts signs warning away trespassers.

The bill would also clarify the definition of criminal trespassing.

Non-criminal examples include someone asking for directions or a Girl Scout selling cookies.

Holdman said several organizations that were originally against the bill – including the Hoosier State Press Association – no longer opposed it with the amended language.

“Since I’ve fought very hard against this bill in different versions, I appreciate the fact that Sen. Holdman has worked with opponents and people who were critical of parts of the bill to correct it and turned it into something that has some value,” said Sen. Mark Stoops, D-Bloomington.


  • ??
    Are these not already crimes? Why do we need this redundant legislation. Just kill the damn thing and move on.
  • Interest
    Perhaps, we need to step back to consider a couple of things here. Which PAC's or lobbyist groups are funding the legislators backing this waste of time, and, as was pointed out earlier, if we already have criminal trespass laws on the books, why waste the time and effort, not to mention the vast resources of pursuing this asinine legislation? Oh, wait, this is a lot like the marriage equality bill, isn't it? Let's just make sure no one can ever question our position...
  • What is the point of this?
    I am continually disappointed with the wasted efforts of our local government. I thought Republicans were for LESS government. This is a waste of taxpayer's money. We need to elect new people. People who will concentrate on real issues in our state. Jobs. Education. Public Safety.
  • Sigh
    More time wasting by Republicans. When will they deal with the real issues facing our state??
  • supermajority
    Well gay marriage isn't legal in Indiana either, and they are still spending how much time and effort on a Constitutional Amendment (that will be struck down but the Supreme Court anyway). So...
  • so...
    I thought it was already illegal to damage another person's property, or to trespass on land with a posted "no trespassing" sign? What is the point of this legislation?

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I am also a "vet" of several Cirque shows and this one left me flat. It didn't have the amount of acrobatic stunts as the others that I have seen. I am still glad that I went to it and look forward to the next one but I put Varekai as my least favorite.

    2. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

    3. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

    4. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

    5. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.