IBJNews

Community tries to wring out another $100M

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Community Health Network thinks it can improve its profitability by $100 million over the next two years by reorganizing itself into patient-centered teams.

It’s the latest move by a local hospital system to cut costs in the face of declining reimbursement from public and private health insurance plans, as well as persistently depressed volumes of procedures.

Community has already cut out more than $130 million in expenses since 2009, but it needs to cut more or find new revenue in order to offset rising levels of bad debt and charity care that have squeezed its profit margins.

In 2012, Community earned operating income of $47.7 million on record revenue of nearly $1.7 billion. But its operating margin, even after excluding a nearly $18 million debt payment, tumbled to 4 percent from 5.7 percent the previous year.

Community’s leaders have set a goal to boost their operating margins back to 5 percent. So on July 1, Community announced the internal restructuring, in what seemed like a modest step toward that goal.

But Community CEO Bryan Mills says the move is critical to reduce waste and ensure high-quality care across its eight-hospital system.

“The patient, regardless of how they entered, they’re going to receive the same care. Regardless of who they saw, they’re going to receive the same care,” Mills said in an interview.

Before, he added, “There was a lot of patients finding their own way rather than us holding their hands.”

The restructuring will place one executive over each of 10 different service lines throughout the entire Community system, such as oncology, cardiology and primary care. Before, Community’s executives were typically in charge of specific hospitals or surgery centers. Those building executives will remain in place, but will now work with the service line executives to standardize care in all settings.

Before, Mills said, various physicians and facilities had different “pathways” for treating patients. Now, he said, Community will determine just one treatment pathway for all patients with the same condition.

Community isn’t the only hospital trying to have one standard of care across its system. Indiana University Health has been trying to do the same thing for years and is still relying on the concept to help it shave more than $1 billion from its annual expenses.

“Variation is the hobgoblin of cost control,” IU Health CEO Dan Evans said in an April interview.

To cut its expenses by about $55 million a year, St. Vincent Health announced a mass layoff of more than 850 people on June 28.

Mills said Community’s restructuring will not reduce the size of its workforce, which numbers more than 9,000, but it might produce churn as new executives are hired and others decide to leave.

Mills hopes the restructuring not only achieves cost savings, but also brings in new revenue. He thinks the combination of both could achieve the goal of $100 million in additional profit.

Community can grow revenue, he said, in part because the new structure will allow system-wide collection of quality and cost data, which will position Community to capitalize on the new kinds of payments being tried by the federal Medicare program, the state-run Medicaid program and private health insurers. Those new payments typically offer a bonus if hospitals can demonstrate high-quality care, good patient outcomes and lower costs.

“The market is demanding various approaches, and we’ve got to be able to adapt,” he said. “This gives us the 'systemness' to determine, 'What’s the cost? Are we achieving the clinical outcomes we want? What’s the quality? Are patients satisfied with the care that was received?'”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Say bye bye to LPNs
    Yesterday, July 15 all of Community Health Network's LPNs were laid off. But not one mention of all of the CEO's taking a salary reduction. When I was laid off in 2010 from there 9 CEO's were on staff. Can you imagine what those folks pull down in salaries, benefits and golden parachutes? The hospital is a top heavy, bloated mess.
  • Clarification
    The physicians and nurses that work for Community Health will determine the patient pathways that will be used throughout the Community system.
  • Trey1
    trey - what do you think Obamacare is? And quit bashing on Community Hospitals - they have provided significant amounts of essentially free care to the indigent people of Indianapolis.
  • Welcome to ACA
    Trey - Welcome to my Affordable Care Act. The pace of care will slow and most hospitals will be providing care via this "cookbook" you speak of. It is the new America. The good news is no matter if you contribute to the working class in America or not, you still get full coverage. All the corporations in this great country will gladly supplement the outrageous burden on spiraling expenses added from those currently uninsured. And, if the corporations can't handle this added expense to their business, we will make sure that we get taxes corrected to leave no American without coverage! It is brilliant, isn't it! Your quality of care will decrease with "cookbook from primarily nurses" and it will take 2 - 3 times longer to get your ailment addressed. I am very optimistic this will be the legacy left by my 2 terms in office. I couldn't be prouder of my accomplishment. Celebrate America.
  • Tread carefully, Community
    "Before, Mills said, various physicians and facilities had different “pathways” for treating patients. Now, he said, Community will determine just one treatment pathway for all patients with the same condition." COMMUNITY will determine? That's sounds suspiciously like a health care SYSTEM is practicing medicine, which is clearly not within it's province. Personally, I'll take a top notch personal physician who knows my medical history and ba ckground making medical decisions with my input, over some lackey practicing medicine by the hospital cookbook. (Chapter 3: Hospital cafeteria recipe for chicken tetrazini, and hospital recipe for plantar fasciitis!)

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

    2. Shouldn't this be a museum

    3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

    4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

    5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

    ADVERTISEMENT