Mickey Levitan spent nearly 30 years running development groups in impoverished
countries and human resources departments in U.S. corporations. He got just a week to decide if he wanted to be an entrepreneur.
Turns out he did. He is now running a startup, Courseload LLC, that aims to transform the world of college textbooks.
The Indianapolis company has developed Web-based software that allows college students to read and electronically mark up
all kinds of college course materials—textbooks, articles, chapters of books, etc. It also has a business model that
Levitan is convinced will make more money for publishers and slash students’ textbook costs—which average $1,200
a year—in half.
His timing is good. The 2010 boom in digital reading
devices, especially Apple’s iPad, could juice digital textbook sales in the United States from a modest $54 million
this year to more than $1 billion by 2014, according to an analysis by Xplana, a division of the textbook wholesaler MBS Textbook
Exchange Inc.
Levitan has funding commitments from multiple sources—including the Indiana 21st Century Fund, the Indiana Innovate
Fund and angel investors, including Cummins CEO Tim Solso. He declined to say how much those investments will bring in, saying
none of them are finalized.
“There is a sense of inevitability on college campuses that this is going to happen,” Levitan said of digital
textbooks. Most of the major textbook publishers’ catalogs are accessible through Courseload’s software.
The chance for Levitan, 53, to launch his own company came in March 2009 via Brad Wheeler, the chief information officer
at Indiana University, who wanted to sponsor pilot projects to try out ways of using digital course materials in IU classrooms.
Wheeler and Levitan had crossed paths nearly a decade earlier, when Levitan and his co-founder, Alan Dennis, first explored
the Courseload idea. Wheeler was an IU business professor pioneering digital technologies in his classroom.
Fresh off a stint at Apple Inc., Levitan was trying to invent something like the iTunes model for digital textbooks—something
that greatly reduced the incentive for piracy while still making money for publishers.
He hooked interest from a couple of universities and investors in Indiana, but one of the investors got skittish, and Levitan
decided the timing wasn’t right. He shelved the idea and instead took a job as human resources director at Indianapolis-based
radio operator Emmis Communications Corp.
Wheeler remembered the Courseload idea when he was looking to run several pilot projects aimed at getting digital textbooks
into IU classrooms. He talked to Dennis, who is also an IU business professor, saying he would need something in action by
August—just six months away.
“We had a week to decide if we were going to do it,” said Levitan, sitting in a conference room in the Indiana
University Emerging Technologies Center, where Courseload now has an office and eight employees.
Levitan and Dennis pulled it off. Now, Courseload is providing its service to Marian University and Rose-Hulman Institute
of Technology and is talking to other schools, including Park Tudor High School and DePauw University.
The latest challenge
Levitan is a man who likes challenges. A Philadelphia native, he spent the first 13 years of his working life in Senegal,
Bangladesh and Thailand, working for the Peace Corps and Save the Children. He speaks four languages.
He took two years off to earn an MBA at Stanford Business School in order to run those organizations better.
He shifted into the corporate world to help those organizations run better, starting as executive assistant to Solso at Columbus-based
Cummins.
Now, he thinks he’s got a business model that will stop the textbook publishing industry from going through the same
piracy nightmares the music and film industries have.
“We’ve talked to all the major publishers, and nobody has come up with a better model,” Levitan claimed.
Still, Courseload has plenty of competition. IU’s Wheeler has tried out other digital textbook companies, including
New York-based Flat World Knowledge Inc. and Houston-based Connexions. Other commercial competitors to Courseload include
VitalSource and CafeScribe, as well as a company formed by major publishers called CourseSmart.
However, Wheeler likes what Courseload is doing because, instead of having each student buy textbooks on a retail basis,
Courseload’s universal-access software allows IU to negotiate prices with the major book publishers first on behalf
of its 109,000 students.
Then the students pay a course materials fee along with their tuition.
“We’re between the now and the not yet of moving to digital textbooks. But the model has not been discerned,”
Wheeler said, adding, “The Courseload model, or any company that allows us to negotiate with the gravitas of the university,
I think that’s one of the core tools of reducing the cost of textbooks.”
Lower prices, higher profits
The reason the major textbook publishers, including Pearson, John Wiley and McGraw-Hill, are willing to deal is this: By
making book fees paid along with tuition, IU guarantees that 100 percent of students will buy the materials.
That means publishers actually generate more sales because students don’t have a used book market to turn to, they
can’t borrow a textbook from a friend who used it last semester, and they can’t check out a copy from a library.
Also, with a much lower price, students have little reason to take advantage of the textbook pirates—many operating
out of China—who scan in popular textbooks and sell cheap PDF versions over the Internet.
“They price with inventory shrinkage built in,” Wheeler said of textbook publishers. “It’s just like
when we go to Macy’s; we’re all paying for shoplifting.”
Levitan estimates a publisher could sell three times as many copies of its digital textbook through Courseload as it does
a traditional printed textbook during its three-year life cycle.
Levitan pulls up a slideshow for investors on his computer monitor—which is propped up by a copy of Jim Collins’
“Good to Great.” According to the presentation, even after Courseload and IU take a cut, the book publishers can
drop their prices 80 percent and still make 10 percent higher profits.
In one example provided by Wheeler, a textbook titled “Employment Law for Human Resource Practice” costs $216
new in the IU Bookstore. A used copy can be had for at least $132 from Amazon. A digital copy for an eReader runs $106. But
Courseload’s price is $70.
If students want to have a printed copy, Courseload will generate one for about $20 extra.
Digital textbooks still have an uphill climb. A survey released in October by the National Association of College Stores
found that 76 percent of students would prefer a print textbook over a digital one.
Even in IU’s research of its students using Courseload materials, 78 percent said printed texts are easier to read.
But the special tools that go with digital textbooks—like the ability of professors and students to make notes and highlights
in key passages and share them with the rest of the class—get high marks.
But above all other factors, it’s the price advantage of digital books that will drive explosive growth, according
to Rob Reynolds, director of research and product design at Xplana, who wrote a 2010 research report on the market.
“Overall,” he concluded, “we expect prices for digital textbooks to remain significantly lower than their
print counterparts, which will continue to stimulate the sales of digital textbooks.”•

















IBJ Conversations
6 Comments
Add Comment
However, if people really think they are going to save money going digital...THINK AGAIN.
The publishers are going to make their money, regardless. They will just charge you the same amount, plus access fees, the college will charge technology fees and in the end it will cost more. They will charge you EVERY semester you use it. You can't recoup money selling it back and if you have to repeat a class...guess what? You get to buy it again.
Also, like Napster changed the music industry forever...how can you keep the content from being shared?
Ebooks might replace the textbook, sure, but it won't save the consumer any money in the end. What is really scary is public schools and private schools trying to latch on to this. I have a school locally that funded mac readers for 17 YEARS and still use textbooks because no one has all the content yet....Those things will be obsolete in 4 max and they financed them that long?
It is not going to SAVE MONEY. It is a bait and switch. The publishers will make their money and lobby to get laws to make sure they do from their fat cat friends at every state level. Be sure of it.
BTW: The motivation for publishers to create "new" editions is the recapture of revenues lost to the used/rental book market. The only loser in this company's strategy is the distribution channel who isn't adding any value anyway.
Or they could not drop their prices at all, and make 90% higher profits. This is what will happen.
I commend Courseload for its own business model but it will not help the major problem in the industry--that of textbooks being overpriced to begin with, and ensuring ongoing revenue by issuing a "new" edition every other year and convincing professors that the previous edition is obsolete.