IBJNews

Company thinks it can make college textbooks obsolete

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Facts on Courseload LLCMickey Levitan spent nearly 30 years running development groups in impoverished countries and human resources departments in U.S. corporations. He got just a week to decide if he wanted to be an entrepreneur.

Turns out he did. He is now running a startup, Courseload LLC, that aims to transform the world of college textbooks.

The Indianapolis company has developed Web-based software that allows college students to read and electronically mark up all kinds of college course materials—textbooks, articles, chapters of books, etc. It also has a business model that Levitan is convinced will make more money for publishers and slash students’ textbook costs—which average $1,200 a year—in half.

Upward trend in billions of sales of online textbookHis timing is good. The 2010 boom in digital reading devices, especially Apple’s iPad, could juice digital textbook sales in the United States from a modest $54 million this year to more than $1 billion by 2014, according to an analysis by Xplana, a division of the textbook wholesaler MBS Textbook Exchange Inc.

Levitan has funding commitments from multiple sources—including the Indiana 21st Century Fund, the Indiana Innovate Fund and angel investors, including Cummins CEO Tim Solso. He declined to say how much those investments will bring in, saying none of them are finalized.

“There is a sense of inevitability on college campuses that this is going to happen,” Levitan said of digital textbooks. Most of the major textbook publishers’ catalogs are accessible through Courseload’s software.

The chance for Levitan, 53, to launch his own company came in March 2009 via Brad Wheeler, the chief information officer at Indiana University, who wanted to sponsor pilot projects to try out ways of using digital course materials in IU classrooms.

Wheeler and Levitan had crossed paths nearly a decade earlier, when Levitan and his co-founder, Alan Dennis, first explored the Courseload idea. Wheeler was an IU business professor pioneering digital technologies in his classroom.

Fresh off a stint at Apple Inc., Levitan was trying to invent something like the iTunes model for digital textbooks—something that greatly reduced the incentive for piracy while still making money for publishers.

He hooked interest from a couple of universities and investors in Indiana, but one of the investors got skittish, and Levitan decided the timing wasn’t right. He shelved the idea and instead took a job as human resources director at Indianapolis-based radio operator Emmis Communications Corp.

Wheeler remembered the Courseload idea when he was looking to run several pilot projects aimed at getting digital textbooks into IU classrooms. He talked to Dennis, who is also an IU business professor, saying he would need something in action by August—just six months away.

“We had a week to decide if we were going to do it,” said Levitan, sitting in a conference room in the Indiana University Emerging Technologies Center, where Courseload now has an office and eight employees.

Levitan and Dennis pulled it off. Now, Courseload is providing its service to Marian University and Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and is talking to other schools, including Park Tudor High School and DePauw University.

The latest challenge

Levitan is a man who likes challenges. A Philadelphia native, he spent the first 13 years of his working life in Senegal, Bangladesh and Thailand, working for the Peace Corps and Save the Children. He speaks four languages.

He took two years off to earn an MBA at Stanford Business School in order to run those organizations better.

He shifted into the corporate world to help those organizations run better, starting as executive assistant to Solso at Columbus-based Cummins.

Now, he thinks he’s got a business model that will stop the textbook publishing industry from going through the same piracy nightmares the music and film industries have.

“We’ve talked to all the major publishers, and nobody has come up with a better model,” Levitan claimed.

Still, Courseload has plenty of competition. IU’s Wheeler has tried out other digital textbook companies, including New York-based Flat World Knowledge Inc. and Houston-based Connexions. Other commercial competitors to Courseload include VitalSource and CafeScribe, as well as a company formed by major publishers called CourseSmart.

However, Wheeler likes what Courseload is doing because, instead of having each student buy textbooks on a retail basis, Courseload’s universal-access software allows IU to negotiate prices with the major book publishers first on behalf of its 109,000 students.

Then the students pay a course materials fee along with their tuition.

“We’re between the now and the not yet of moving to digital textbooks. But the model has not been discerned,” Wheeler said, adding, “The Courseload model, or any company that allows us to negotiate with the gravitas of the university, I think that’s one of the core tools of reducing the cost of textbooks.”

Lower prices, higher profits

The reason the major textbook publishers, including Pearson, John Wiley and McGraw-Hill, are willing to deal is this: By making book fees paid along with tuition, IU guarantees that 100 percent of students will buy the materials.

That means publishers actually generate more sales because students don’t have a used book market to turn to, they can’t borrow a textbook from a friend who used it last semester, and they can’t check out a copy from a library.

Also, with a much lower price, students have little reason to take advantage of the textbook pirates—many operating out of China—who scan in popular textbooks and sell cheap PDF versions over the Internet.

“They price with inventory shrinkage built in,” Wheeler said of textbook publishers. “It’s just like when we go to Macy’s; we’re all paying for shoplifting.”

Levitan estimates a publisher could sell three times as many copies of its digital textbook through Courseload as it does a traditional printed textbook during its three-year life cycle.

Levitan pulls up a slideshow for investors on his computer monitor—which is propped up by a copy of Jim Collins’ “Good to Great.” According to the presentation, even after Courseload and IU take a cut, the book publishers can drop their prices 80 percent and still make 10 percent higher profits.

In one example provided by Wheeler, a textbook titled “Employment Law for Human Resource Practice” costs $216 new in the IU Bookstore. A used copy can be had for at least $132 from Amazon. A digital copy for an eReader runs $106. But Courseload’s price is $70.

If students want to have a printed copy, Courseload will generate one for about $20 extra.

Digital textbooks still have an uphill climb. A survey released in October by the National Association of College Stores found that 76 percent of students would prefer a print textbook over a digital one.

Even in IU’s research of its students using Courseload materials, 78 percent said printed texts are easier to read. But the special tools that go with digital textbooks—like the ability of professors and students to make notes and highlights in key passages and share them with the rest of the class—get high marks.

But above all other factors, it’s the price advantage of digital books that will drive explosive growth, according to Rob Reynolds, director of research and product design at Xplana, who wrote a 2010 research report on the market.

“Overall,” he concluded, “we expect prices for digital textbooks to remain significantly lower than their print counterparts, which will continue to stimulate the sales of digital textbooks.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Annoying
    I've been forced into using this software this semester. It has got to be the most annoying software I've ever used. If you use it on your laptop, you end up in the most uncomfortable position. If you use your iPad you can't scroll down the page, it's too difficult. Eventually your eyes grow tired from staring at the screen trying to read your textbook. The search function doesn't work as well as they would like you to think. Nice idea, but I ended up buying the books after I paid 75/per course for this thing that was forced down my throat. Furious about that part!
  • Bait and Switch
    Bravo for him understanding the need to have content accessible in one centralized location. Also, the storefront concept of digital is lacking. People like to have a tangible feeling when buying a book and that is missing in ebooks. There will always be bricks and mortars for this reason, but with the intergration of digital concepts. There will be less of them, yes. He is essentially connecting the dots for people looking for a centralized place to find lots of options. That is lacking now.
    However, if people really think they are going to save money going digital...THINK AGAIN.
    The publishers are going to make their money, regardless. They will just charge you the same amount, plus access fees, the college will charge technology fees and in the end it will cost more. They will charge you EVERY semester you use it. You can't recoup money selling it back and if you have to repeat a class...guess what? You get to buy it again.
    Also, like Napster changed the music industry forever...how can you keep the content from being shared?
    Ebooks might replace the textbook, sure, but it won't save the consumer any money in the end. What is really scary is public schools and private schools trying to latch on to this. I have a school locally that funded mac readers for 17 YEARS and still use textbooks because no one has all the content yet....Those things will be obsolete in 4 max and they financed them that long?
    It is not going to SAVE MONEY. It is a bait and switch. The publishers will make their money and lobby to get laws to make sure they do from their fat cat friends at every state level. Be sure of it.
  • Why not cut publishers
    Professors write the books and universities have the means to create course material. Who need publishers?
  • Bound to happen
    I agree that this is a great idea at the right time. It comes at the convergence of several hot technologies that are relevant to education - eReaders, social computing, and richer content. The Courseload team is on an exciting journey and I think they will change the way education happens.

    BTW: The motivation for publishers to create "new" editions is the recapture of revenues lost to the used/rental book market. The only loser in this company's strategy is the distribution channel who isn't adding any value anyway.
  • Shop around
    This is a great idea and if it works at lowering textbook prices it will really help students. This years hot item was renting textbooks but many times you can still buy a used textbook cheaper. With over a dozen textbook rental sites my recommendation is to use a price comparison tool to show the cheapest rental price like the free service at www.Cheap-Textbook-Rentals.com. Makes it much easier to compare all the sources and make a decision.
  • A good start, but...no
    "According to the presentation, even after Courseload and IU take a cut, the book publishers can drop their prices 80 percent and still make 10 percent higher profits."

    Or they could not drop their prices at all, and make 90% higher profits. This is what will happen.

    I commend Courseload for its own business model but it will not help the major problem in the industry--that of textbooks being overpriced to begin with, and ensuring ongoing revenue by issuing a "new" edition every other year and convincing professors that the previous edition is obsolete.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT