IBJNews

Consumer group touts financial benefits of energy efficiency

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
On The Beat Industry News In Brief

A new report by the Consumer Federation of America touts the consumer benefits of climate and energy legislation, predicting household savings if “strong energy efficiency policies” are adopted.

Such efficiency-heavy legislation could save Hoosier families $424 a year, said Washington, D.C.-based CFA in “Building on the Success of Energy Efficiency Programs to Ensure an Affordable Energy Future.”

But opponents of energy/climate change legislation—which has predominantly been in the form of so-called cap-and-trade legislation—aren’t convinced.

Jim Rogers, CEO of Charlotte, N.C.-based Duke Energy, the largest electric supplier in Indiana, warned previously that electric bills could soar 40 percent in some areas under cap-and-trade scenarios being batted about last year.

Indiana would take a disproportionate beating because nearly 95 percent of electricity in the state is generated by coal. Utilities serving the state would be forced to buy allowances to emit CO2 and/or to invest in alternative generation such as wind or even nuclear power.

CFA says an energy policy more focused on energy efficiency could reduce overall energy use up to 30 percent, as well as create jobs.

“Cap-and-trade has monopolized the headlines. But given its stellar record of success, it’s time for senators to view energy efficiency as a cornerstone of the nation’s climate and energy policy,” said Mark Cooper, research director for CFA.

“Consumers are letting hundreds of dollars a year slip through their fingers, money they can hardly afford to waste,” said Jesse Kharbanda, executive director of the Hoosier Environmental Council.

But the Congressional Budget Office estimated that a 15-percent reduction in emissions would cause prices to rise to the tune of 3.3 percent of after-tax income for the lowest income household—or about $680 a year.

The effects on the middle class could mean an income hit of 2.7 percent to 2.9 percent, or about $880 to $1,500 a year, said the CBO.

Such numbers don’t mean much, however, until Congress comes up with a plan. Early this month, the Senate began reviving energy legislation efforts put on the back burner by health care reform.


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Half of these comments make no sense really; Carmel (rolls eyes; everyone has this high regard but honestly I think people in Carmel are blind) IUPUI- shouldn't receive any accolades for parking garages (location and design wise) Indianapolis with a deteriorating circle center mall doesn't need another complex with the hope of retailers to come, we don't need twenty more CVS's and Starbucks'; I can fly to New York City and find a couple dead blocks; they exist so what...Indianapolis needs an actual downtown population to achieve more...that 120 million pay raise Mr Simon wants; maybe he should re-invest it in downtown Indianapolis..he is sure investing the company funds in Boston...

  2. Zionsville/Eagle Creek is a lovely area however there is one thing that it is severely lacking and that is mountain bike trails. The east side of the city has two wonderful trails available (Ft. Ben and Town Run) and both of these areas are undoubtedly better because of these two trails. Not only do these trails give these parks even more use (more money for the parks) but the people that use these trails are helping to preserve the park through trash pick-up, trail maintenance, and public education. Eagle Creek, it's time to catch up!

  3. DRT...

    Sorry for the confusion and poor wording on my part. There's no official indication that One America opposes retail.

    I was expressing my difficulty in imagining a reason for One America to oppose a more attractive mixed-use structure.

  4. this is an easy one, gambling casinos in all large hotels in the state. Invite in Donald Trump and all the casino owners from Las Vegas. Also, legalize the Indian tribes in Indiana to open casinos tax free. Rivers are a natural for this, the Wabash, the Tippecanoe, and the Ohio Rivers as gambling highways and Lake Michigan from Gary, Indiana. If this is an industry, which it is not, because it makes nothing, it redistributes wealth, instate and out of state. Maybe casinos attached to all shopping malls, Greenwood, Castleton, Keystone at the Crossing.

  5. The state can solve this easily, riverboat gambling in the Ohio River Indiana side, also, Indianapolis converts Union Station to a casino, that way central Indiana residents will not leave the state to gamble. Also, riverboat gambling in Gary , Indiana, Terre Haute, and all along the Wabash River from Lafayette to Terre Haute, to Vincennes. Riverboat tours and vacations as well.

ADVERTISEMENT