Could WellPoint woes breathe life into health reform?

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

WellPoint Inc. has spent the week as Public Enemy No. 1 after President Obama called out the company for raising premiums on individual customers by as much as 39 percent.

The company’s political “tin ear”—as one Wall Street analyst put it—could reignite a push for health reform.

“If anything could, it would be something like this,” said Les Funtleyder, a health care stock analyst at Miller Tabak & Co. in New York.

But, more likely, hatred of WellPoint is only powerful enough to help pass small pieces of the now-languishing health bills in Congress. One example would be a cap on health insurer profits.

The larger health reform bills passed by the House and Senate late last year have languished for nearly a month now, with Democrats feuding over the best way forward. Many have declared the bills dead.

Obama and other Democratic leaders are trying to use WellPoint to rile up voters for one more push. Polls show that a majority of the public dislikes the bills in Congress, but large majorities want something done to fix the nation’s health care and insurance system.

“It could embolden the Democratic leadership,” Brian Vargus, a professor of political science at IUPUI, said of the outcry over WellPoint’s rate hike. But, he added, “My gut feeling is they’ll do something smaller.”

News of WellPoint’s premium increase for customers that buy insurance on their own, and not through their employers, surfaced last week in California. Obama trumpeted the maximum 39 percent increase in a Sunday television interview, right before the Super Bowl. Then he mentioned it again during a Tuesday press conference.

Obama’s health secretary, Kathleen Sebelius, wrote a letter to WellPoint demanding an explanation. House Democrats have scheduled a committee hearing for Feb. 24 and requested that WellPoint CEO Angela Braly come to explain her company’s rate hikes.

“Is this justifiable? We’re going to find out,” Funtleyder said, adding that he doubts the rate hike is entirely justified. “If it really was a justifiable business thing, they should have anticipated blowback in the political environment.”

Investors have so far been nonplussed by the news, Funtleyder said. But WellPoint's stock price has fallen 4 percent this week while the broader markets were flat. The company's shares now trade for about $59.35 apiece.

For its part, WellPoint defended its premium increases as the result of a bad economy that prompted many healthy customers to drop their insurance coverage, leaving the high medical costs of other members to be spread out over fewer customers.

“The result is an insured pool that uses significantly more per individual than under better economic times,” wrote Brian Sassi, WellPoint’s CEO of consumer business, in a letter to Sebelius. “This is turn leads to higher costs in the pool and to rate increases higher than general medical inflation.”

Sebelius wasn't appeased, telling the Associated Press "it remains difficult to understand" how premium increases of that size can be justified when WellPoint reported a $4.75 billion profit in the last quarter of 2009.

WellPoint also says its premium hikes included some increase due to its customer base aging. Excluding that effect, the premium increases ranged from 20 percent to 35 percent.

An independent actuary in California said WellPoint’s premium increases were justified by actuarial science. The same occurred in Indiana, where all premium increases are subject to actuarial review before they go into effect.

The Indiana Department of Insurance used an outside actuary to OK premium increases for WellPoint’s individual policies. Those new prices will take effect March 1.

“We feel like that process is protecting the consumer,” said Doug Webber, acting commissioner of the Indiana insurance department. “We think the system works.”


  • Millions of new customers.
    I believe that Wellpoint and the Obama Administraton have been working very closely on this to help pass his reform.They will both win. He gets control and the forced beholding of another 16% of our employed citizens, Wellpoint gets millions of new customers and billions more in profits. The statement made by Wellpoint spokeswoman ,Kristen Binns, says it all. "Reform should include a MANDATE that people buy Health-care coverage". The expropriation of the U.S. will be complete!
  • Individual Insurance
    If you live in Indiana and received a rate increase from Wellpoint, cancel your insurance with them and move to Golden Rule Insurance who specializes in individual insurance coverage.
  • CA!
    We are talking about California - I'm surprised they even do business there......
  • A Man With A Brain - Should Be President
    only sensible thing I've heard during the whole health care reform talks -
    Not only in private sector but Federal employees with BCBS have had their rates increased 8%-10%
  • Wellpoint Health ins increase
    Review this to learn more as to the reason for the increase.
  • Can't we all agree the current system isn't working?
    The small business insurance market is currently in a "death spiral" caused by younger, healthier, people dropping out of the insured pool, leaving people that are on average, more costly to insure. These people require higher rates to make up for their health care costs, since those costs, per participant, are now higher. So now that rates are going up forty percent, then more people are going to drop out, this time with people not quite as healthy as the first round, but certainly not the sick and infirmed. This will, in turn, lead to higher rate jumps again next year, and so on. The ONLY solution to such a death spiral is to mandate health insurance for all citizens, thereby including everyone in the pool again, and bringing costs back in line. Whether that's a single-payer system or a Massachusetts-like system, something has to be done here, and it's certainly not related to "tort reform", which we already have here in Indiana. As a small business owner in a tough economy, health care costs that jump so much can be very painful. Health care reform is critical to the health of small businesses, and the jobs they bring to our country.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

  2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

  3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

  4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

  5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.