IBJNews

Council hopes historic value nixes IU land swap

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Bloomington leaders are hoping a proposed new historic designation persuades Indiana University to think twice about a land-swap plan that could include razing six houses to make way for a new fraternity building.

The IU Foundation has offered the houses on the corner of Woodlawn Avenue and Eighth Street to Phi Gamma Delta in exchange for the fraternity's house on Third Street next to the IU Maurer School of Law, The Herald-Times reported.

The houses are included in 65 properties that the City Council has included in the University Courts Historic District. More than half of the properties are owned by IU, which isn't required to obtain a certificate of appropriateness from the city before demolishing structures in the district.

"They're not going to be subject to local regulation," assistant city attorney Patty Mulvihill said. "We cannot locally regulate their property."

Council members said they hoped the historic designation would prompt IU and the fraternity to reconsider their plans for the neighborhood, where buildings were designed by architects like John Lincoln Nichols and Alfred Grindle. Most of the houses were built between 1906 and 1934, and their occupants included a governor, mayor, county judge and various IU professors and coaches.

The neighborhood, which received state historic status in 1992 and national recognition in 2007, is also the last area in the city with brick streets.

"Maybe this designation will be a small wake-up call," Councilman Chris Sturbaum said. "I certainly hope that it will."

IU spokesman Mark Land declined to comment on the historic district proposal. He said there's no firm timeline for the land swap because the deal is contingent on the fraternity raising the money to build a new house.

Council of Neighborhood Associations representative Jon Lawrence said he favored establishing local protection for the neighborhood.

"We think this is an incredibly important neighborhood to save," Lawrence said. "It's kind of hard to imagine it not being protected."

A vote on the University Courts Historic District is scheduled for March 12.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Better Land Use Planning
    Considering the overall positive impact Indiana University has on Bloomington and the State of Indiana, it is disappointing that when it comes to many land use and planning decisions, the University fails to live up to its ideals. In a world where people are increasingly searching for a sense of connectedness to place, it is ever more important for IU to adhere to best practices in land use and planning decisions. IU must re-evaluate the policies that would allow for the destruction of relevant historic structures, as well as suburban-style development patterns in downtown Indianapolis.
  • Hope
    Let's hope this, and continued public opposition, stops IU from destroying this historic area.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT