IBJNews

Council tables vote on TIF proposal after lawsuit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Facing a lawsuit from a city activist, the Indianapolis City-County Council put off voting Monday night on a long-delayed proposal to expand a downtown tax-increment financing district.

The council voted 20-8 to send the proposal back to the Metropolitan and Economic Development Committee, where it will have a hearing Sept. 24 with the expectation that it will be back before the full council Oct. 1.

The proposal would pave the way for redevelopment of the Massachusetts Avenue fire station and support other projects, including a West 16th Street technology corridor and new development on the northwest side of downtown.

In a lawsuit filed in Marion Superior Court Monday, environmental activist Clarke Kahlo alleges that the committee failed to follow proper procedure when it voted on the proposal last month. He argues the proposal had been tabled for longer than six months and, under municipal code, should have been taken off the list of pending proposals.

He also wants the court to declare some committee members' action to revive the proposal invalid.

Former committee Chairman Steve Talley had refused to hear the proposal, sponsored by fellow Democrats Vop Osili and Joe Simpson, until the council adopted a new set of policies on tax-increment finance districts.

At the committee's last meeting Aug. 27, Talley declared the meeting adjourned and left the room, as did Kahlo and other members of the audience. Realizing that Talley had not properly adjourned the meeting, Councilor Mary Moriarty-Adams took control.

Osili, also a member of the committee, introduced an amendment that includes $13.5 million for work force development, micro-lending and a revolving loan fund.

Reading the minutes from that meeting, Moriarty-Adams said the vote was 5-0, but Kahlo's lawsuit says the vote was 5-1.

Council Vice President Brian Mahern, who pushed to keep the downtown TIF expansion off the agenda, objected to Moriarty-Adams' version of events. “I would like to lodge my personal objection to the committee report that was just read,” he said.

Minority leader Michael McQuillen urged the council to go ahead and vote on the proposal. “The citizens of our city want a thumbs-up or a thumbs-down on this issue,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT