IBJNews

Council tables vote on TIF proposal after lawsuit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Facing a lawsuit from a city activist, the Indianapolis City-County Council put off voting Monday night on a long-delayed proposal to expand a downtown tax-increment financing district.

The council voted 20-8 to send the proposal back to the Metropolitan and Economic Development Committee, where it will have a hearing Sept. 24 with the expectation that it will be back before the full council Oct. 1.

The proposal would pave the way for redevelopment of the Massachusetts Avenue fire station and support other projects, including a West 16th Street technology corridor and new development on the northwest side of downtown.

In a lawsuit filed in Marion Superior Court Monday, environmental activist Clarke Kahlo alleges that the committee failed to follow proper procedure when it voted on the proposal last month. He argues the proposal had been tabled for longer than six months and, under municipal code, should have been taken off the list of pending proposals.

He also wants the court to declare some committee members' action to revive the proposal invalid.

Former committee Chairman Steve Talley had refused to hear the proposal, sponsored by fellow Democrats Vop Osili and Joe Simpson, until the council adopted a new set of policies on tax-increment finance districts.

At the committee's last meeting Aug. 27, Talley declared the meeting adjourned and left the room, as did Kahlo and other members of the audience. Realizing that Talley had not properly adjourned the meeting, Councilor Mary Moriarty-Adams took control.

Osili, also a member of the committee, introduced an amendment that includes $13.5 million for work force development, micro-lending and a revolving loan fund.

Reading the minutes from that meeting, Moriarty-Adams said the vote was 5-0, but Kahlo's lawsuit says the vote was 5-1.

Council Vice President Brian Mahern, who pushed to keep the downtown TIF expansion off the agenda, objected to Moriarty-Adams' version of events. “I would like to lodge my personal objection to the committee report that was just read,” he said.

Minority leader Michael McQuillen urged the council to go ahead and vote on the proposal. “The citizens of our city want a thumbs-up or a thumbs-down on this issue,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Can your dog sign a marriage license or personally state that he wishes to join you in a legal union? If not then no, you cannot marry him. When you teach him to read, write, and speak a discernible language, then maybe you'll have a reasonable argument. Thanks for playing!

  2. Look no further than Mike Rowe, the former host of dirty jobs, who was also a classically trained singer.

  3. Current law states income taxes are paid to the county of residence not county of income source. The most likely scenario would be some alteration of the income tax distribution formula so money earned in Marion co. would go to Marion Co by residents of other counties would partially be distributed to Marion co. as opposed to now where the entirety is held by the resident's county.

  4. This is more same-old, same-old from a new generation of non-progressive 'progressives and fear mongers. One only needs to look at the economic havoc being experienced in California to understand the effect of drought on economies and people's lives. The same mindset in California turned a blind eye to the growth of population and water needs in California, defeating proposal after proposal to build reservoirs, improve water storage and delivery infrastructure...and the price now being paid for putting the demands of a raucous minority ahead of the needs of many. Some people never, never learn..

  5. I wonder if I can marry him too? Considering we are both males, wouldn't that be a same sex marriage as well? If they don't honor it, I'll scream discrimination just like all these people have....

ADVERTISEMENT