IBJNews

County commissioner pushes to invalidate I-69 vote

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A Monroe County commissioner is pushing to invalidate a Bloomington planning panel's vote that added a contentious section of the Indianapolis-to-Evansville Interstate 69 extension to the group's local highway plan.

Mark Stoops alleges that last Friday's 7-6 vote by the policy committee of the Bloomington/Monroe County Metropolitan Planning Organization is invalid because one member failed to disclose a potential conflict of interest, The Herald-Times reported.

The group's decision to include the I-69 extension in its local plan was needed to ensure that the state Department of Transportation could use federal funds to build a 1.75-mile segment of the highway within the MPO's jurisdiction. That funding had been in question since the panel voted last May to omit that section, citing concerns about how it would be funded and the highway project's environmental impact.

Stoops, who is a member of the MPO, contends that fellow member Bill Williams has a conflict of interest because he has a son who works for a subcontractor that's involved in construction of the I-69 extension. Stoops said that under state statute that amounts to a conflict of interest that should have been reviewed by a third party.

"That first step under state statute is that the appointing authority, the county commissioners, must request a review and a decision by the MPO in writing," Stoops said in the prepared statement. "That was not done."

He said the county's commissioners can only act in a public meeting and he was only notified of the potential conflict of interest issue last Thursday, the day before the four-hour meeting and the close vote in favor of adding the highway to the local transportation plan.

Stoops said Williams, who's the county's highway director, should have recused himself from that vote, but Monroe County Attorney Dave Schilling disagrees.

Schilling said the county legal department has advised Williams that it doesn't believe the situation represents a conflict of interest. He said the county's legal department heard late Thursday that the issue might be raised at the Friday meeting, and ultimately advised Williams that it did not believe he had a conflict of interest.

Schilling said Monday that that position had not changed.

A message left Tuesday at Willliams' office seeking comment was not immediately returned. The Herald-Times reported that Williams was unavailable for comment because he is out of the office until next Monday.

Stoops contends that if Williams' "yes" vote is invalid, then the vote would be 6-6 and the motion to include I-69 in the TIP would have failed. He does not believe there would need to be a re-vote on the issue if that was the case.

Bloomington Mayor Mark Kruzan, who also cast a "no" vote at Friday's meeting, said he believes the statute Stoops referred to is not applicable to local entities. But Kruzan said attorneys will have to look at the code and make the determination.

Schilling said the appeals process is not clearly set out for such metropolitan planning organizations because the "MPO is a unique creature."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Reply to Joe
    Joe --

    You really just want to bash Mitch. Otherwise, you would have done your homework. The extension won its initial support (in Indiana) from then Governor Evan Bayh. It was also supported by the O'Bannon administration. It's already underway in other states. All Mitch did was help fund it, which would have happened regardless of who was in the State house. Read up on it.
  • CRANE
    The hi-way is not a waste. It helps connect Crane base to major interstates and without Crane Bloomington becomes a ghost town.
  • I hope the voters eject these people that are wasting time
    This is a done deal people. Do you think delaying a 2 mile stretch is doing anyting but wasting our time and taxpayer dollars in Monroe county? Anyone that voted against this measure should be voted OUT! It's a done deal people. The USA interstate hiway system is one of the reasons Indianapolis is on the map!
  • This is a Waste!
    The connection was already established. I shouldn't need to pay for a trucker to shave some time off his route from Mexico to Canada because Mitch made some donors happy. Road construction is a rhelic that Indiana just can't move past. Contractors are so deep in politicians wallets that they spin the truth so it seems like it adds jobs and helps commerce..........NEWS FLASH! It doesnt!
  • I-69
    This will connect not only Bloomington but also Evansville, the third largest city in Indiana. I do not believe this is a waste of money.
  • Move on
    I-69 might be a huge waste of time and money, but it's already under construction and is a done deal. It's time to move on from this issue, DST and single class basketball.
  • GOP = ?
    Republicans.....Enviroment...NAH

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT